2022
DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000874180.84660.8b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Sacrococcygeal Skeletal Morphology and Morphometry Influence Pressure Injury Formation in Adults?

Abstract: GENERAL PURPOSETo present a study that investigated sacrococcygeal skeletal structure as a possible nonmodifiable intrinsic risk factor for pressure injury and identify possible issues caused by its morphology.TARGET AUDIENCEThis continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMESAfter participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Recognize the background inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delmore et al 23 proposed that patients with pressure injuries tend to have a smaller sacrococcygeal angle and a larger intercoccygeal angle. In this context, the intercoccygeal angle mentioned in our paper should be understood as the difference between 180° and the intercoccygeal angle value measured in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delmore et al 23 proposed that patients with pressure injuries tend to have a smaller sacrococcygeal angle and a larger intercoccygeal angle. In this context, the intercoccygeal angle mentioned in our paper should be understood as the difference between 180° and the intercoccygeal angle value measured in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A patient's skeletal morphology may be an intrinsic nonmodifiable risk for Prl. 34 In addition, physical changes in persons with spinal cord injury may increase PrI risk, such as changes in the sacral and ischial area that lead to skeletal muscle atrophy, fat infiltration into muscles, bone shape loss leading to flattening of the tips of the ischial tuberosities, and thinning of the skin around the ischial tuberosities. 35 In a study that evaluated patients with (n = 15) and without (n = 15) full-thickness sacrococcygeal PrIs, Delmore and colleagues 34 found that patients with PrIs had different morphology and morphometry.…”
Section: Anatomic Pri Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A patient’s skeletal morphology may be an intrinsic nonmodifiable risk for Prl 34 . In addition, physical changes in persons with spinal cord injury may increase PrI risk, such as changes in the sacral and ischial area that lead to skeletal muscle atrophy, fat infiltration into muscles, bone shape loss leading to flattening of the tips of the ischial tuberosities, and thinning of the skin around the ischial tuberosities 35 .…”
Section: Beyond Risk Assessment Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent retrospective case-control study by Delmore and colleagues compared the skeletal sacrococcygeal region of 15 patients with full-thickness PIs to 15 patients without fullthickness PIs using MRIs 38 . The premise of this study was to determine if the skeletal sacrococcygeal region may act as a possible intrinsic PI risk factor.…”
Section: Specific Anatomical Areas At Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%