2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does self esteem moderate the relation between gender and weight preoccupation in undergraduates?

Abstract: This is an author-produced, peer-reviewed version of this article. © 2009, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). The final, definitive version of this document can be found online at Personality and Individual Differnces, doi: 10.1016Differnces, doi: 10. /j.paid.2009 1 NOTICE: This is the author's version of a work accepted for publication by Elsevier. Changes resulting from the publis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample items include: “I think my stomach is too big” and “I exaggerate or magnify the importance of weight.” For our study, we combined the Drive for Thinness and Bulimia subscales to create to measure a single construct of “eating pathology.” Based on the current sample of men, the Eating Pathology and Body Dissatisfaction subscales obtained Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates of .92 and .87, respectively. Pritchard (2010) found a mean of 19.2 ( SD = 16.4) in a sample of 232 men. The mean and standard deviation found in the current sample were 32.6 and 16.9, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sample items include: “I think my stomach is too big” and “I exaggerate or magnify the importance of weight.” For our study, we combined the Drive for Thinness and Bulimia subscales to create to measure a single construct of “eating pathology.” Based on the current sample of men, the Eating Pathology and Body Dissatisfaction subscales obtained Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates of .92 and .87, respectively. Pritchard (2010) found a mean of 19.2 ( SD = 16.4) in a sample of 232 men. The mean and standard deviation found in the current sample were 32.6 and 16.9, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Based on the current sample of men, the Eating Pathology and Body Dissatisfaction subscales obtained Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates of .92 and .87, respectively. Pritchard (2010) found a mean of 19.2 (SD ϭ 16.4) in a sample of 232 men. The mean and standard deviation found in the current sample were 32.6 and 16.9, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…self esteem were measured by using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, which its reliability and validity has been shown in other studies. [26] This scale uses a variety of questions assessing personal feelings about oneself as well as positive and negative emotions (e.g., I feel I have a number of good qualities). Responses were measured on a 4-point scale (0 = strongly agree, 3 = strongly disagree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%