2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does self-esteem or social desirability account for a general factor of personality (GFP) in the Big Five?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we fit a model with five latent factors corresponding to OCEAN, estimating all covariances between latent factors (χ 2 = 4,919.67, CFI = .85, RMSEA = .10). Second, we fit a model using the General Factor of Personality (Erdle & Rushton, ; Van der Linden, Scholte, Cillessen, te Neijenhuis, & Segers, ), which is a common second‐order trait in the personality literature (χ 2 = 5,083.59, CFI = .84, RMSEA = .10). Finally, we fit the model as shown in Figure , which added a sixth factor and left all factors constrained to have covariances of zero (χ 2 = 2,078.66, CFI = .94, RMSEA = .07); allowing additional paths meant the model was no longer identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we fit a model with five latent factors corresponding to OCEAN, estimating all covariances between latent factors (χ 2 = 4,919.67, CFI = .85, RMSEA = .10). Second, we fit a model using the General Factor of Personality (Erdle & Rushton, ; Van der Linden, Scholte, Cillessen, te Neijenhuis, & Segers, ), which is a common second‐order trait in the personality literature (χ 2 = 5,083.59, CFI = .84, RMSEA = .10). Finally, we fit the model as shown in Figure , which added a sixth factor and left all factors constrained to have covariances of zero (χ 2 = 2,078.66, CFI = .94, RMSEA = .07); allowing additional paths meant the model was no longer identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erdle et al (2010) found that the GFP was highly related to self-esteem in an internet sample of over 600,000 people, and then published a follow-up study (Erdle and Rushton, 2011a) showing that this association could not be explained by social desirability. Using undergraduate samples, Erdle and Rushton (2011b) also found an association between the GFP and self-esteem that was not accounted for by social desirability. This paper also reported positive associations between the GFP and positive affect and expectations of reward, along with negative associations between the GFP and negative affect and expectations for punishment.…”
Section: Is There a General Factor Of Personality?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is an extensive literature that addresses those concerns (e.g. Dunkel & Van der Linden, 2014;Erdle & Rushton, 2011;Irwing, 2013;Rushton & Erdle, 2010), we do not want to enter into that discussion here. Instead, we briefly want to touch on a study by Hopwood, Wright, and Donnellan (2011), who challenged the existence of the GFP per se as being a product of methodological bias and statistical Personality Moderates Stress and Coping Reactions misconduct.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%