2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Sequence Conservation Provide Evidence for Biological Function?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Bobay and coauthors have detected different prophage sequences in the whole genome of 20 strains of S. enterica and classified them based on their sequence similarity in order to understand prophage integration patterns and their genetic adaptation to host genomes (Bobay et al, 2013 ). These sequence variants may arise from modular exchange with other prophage DNA, mutation, adaptational shift, and/or drift (Brüssow et al, 2004 ; Boyd et al, 2012 ; Omer et al, 2017 ) and these changes can be expected to have evolutionary implications (Diard et al, 2017 ). To that end, prophage diversity within bacterial strains does not only rely on the presence or absence of a certain prophage, but also on the conservation of the prophage sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bobay and coauthors have detected different prophage sequences in the whole genome of 20 strains of S. enterica and classified them based on their sequence similarity in order to understand prophage integration patterns and their genetic adaptation to host genomes (Bobay et al, 2013 ). These sequence variants may arise from modular exchange with other prophage DNA, mutation, adaptational shift, and/or drift (Brüssow et al, 2004 ; Boyd et al, 2012 ; Omer et al, 2017 ) and these changes can be expected to have evolutionary implications (Diard et al, 2017 ). To that end, prophage diversity within bacterial strains does not only rely on the presence or absence of a certain prophage, but also on the conservation of the prophage sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are supported by the analyses of 58 nucleotide sequences of isolates of the three known species whose P15 amino acid sequences cover a spectrum of identity ranging from 14 to 100%. The main predictions have been obtained by integrating the results of different computational methods because of the premise that each of these elements taken in isolation does not allow to draw solid conclusions about the activity and function of a given protein (Omer et al, 2017;Ponting, 2017;Ravantti et al, 2020). Taken them together, we posit a theory that partially describes the evolution of the cilevirus genomes that involves elements denoting the likely close interplay during the coevolutionary history of Brevipalpus-transmitted viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is it more likely that RNAi evolved as a defense against parasitic genetic elements at the cost of disrupting or altering gene regulation, or as a multifunctional process that can regulate gene expression, favor heterochromatin formation, and inhibit TEs and viruses? When addressing this fundamental question, one should bear in mind that biological complexity can emerge by neutral events and may become essential even if it is useless [ 19 , 22 , 113 116 ]; that a specific function can originate from exaptation of a trait that was selected for a different function [ 79 ]; and that the characteristics of most biological entities may produce important physiological and evolutionary by-products [ 1 ]. Furthermore, macromolecules are also dynamically interconnected inside the crowded cellular environment [ 21 ], with an incredible number of possible interactions and activities, most of which will have no effect on fitness [ 19 , 115 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%