1978
DOI: 10.1177/106591297803100403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Sex Make a Difference? a Case Study of Women in Politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence is mixed on the relationship between gender and policy outcomes-conclusions vary depending on the policymaker's role and domain, and most work emphasizes domestic institutions. For elected officials and constituency support, some studies confirm disparities (Fowlkes, Perkins, and Rinehart, 1979;Mezey, 1978), while others do not (Bers, 1978). Most work assumes that women see themselves as ''uniquely qualified,'' and some have questioned if gender is a political or biological variable (Reingold, 1992).…”
Section: Judges and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence is mixed on the relationship between gender and policy outcomes-conclusions vary depending on the policymaker's role and domain, and most work emphasizes domestic institutions. For elected officials and constituency support, some studies confirm disparities (Fowlkes, Perkins, and Rinehart, 1979;Mezey, 1978), while others do not (Bers, 1978). Most work assumes that women see themselves as ''uniquely qualified,'' and some have questioned if gender is a political or biological variable (Reingold, 1992).…”
Section: Judges and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the range of gendered life experiences cannot fully be brought to bear on the public policy debate unless women as well as men are at the table, gendered private sphere roles create a paradox: While they may mean that women bring differ^t concems to the table, and as such make descriptive representation critical to the substantive representation of women, women's traditional roles as caregivers long have been considered obstacles to improved descriptive representation, for they seem to discourage women more than men from seeking public office (Carroll, 1989;Diamond, 1977;Dubeck, 1976;Kirkpatrick, 1974;Lee, 1976;Mandel, 1983;Mezey, 1978;Nechemias, 1985;Sapiro, 1982;Sapiro & Farah, 1980).^ This article confrt>nts the paradox by exploring change and stability in the relative compatibility of women's and men's private responsibilities with their public roles as officeholders, and what these trends may mean for progress toward increased descriptive representation. The analysis focuses primarily on state legislators, for they serve in institutions that deal with important matters of public policy, where women's gains provided adequate numbo^ for study in the earlier time periods, and which have served as stepping-stones to more visible and prestigious offices such as govemor and United States Congress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies often found no gender gap in political attitudes among party elites and elected officials (Kirkpatrick, 1974(Kirkpatrick, , 1976Mezey, 1978;Jennings and Farah, 1981). By the late 1980s, however, women politicians and activists were found quite consistently more liberal than their male counterparts on a wide variety of issues ranging from social welfare and government regulation to defense, crime and punishment, and women's rights.…”
Section: Previous Findings About Gender and Attitudes Among Politicalmentioning
confidence: 97%