2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does sexual experience affect the strength of male mate choice for high‐quality females in Drosophila melanogaster?

Abstract: Traditional theories of sexual selection predict that females should be the choosier sex in most species because of their higher investment in offspring production and lower variance in fitness (Andersson, 1994;Bateman, 1948). Although this is often the case, there is increasing evidence in various species that males will show courtship and mating preferences for certain females over others when given a choice (Amundsen, 2000;Bonduriansky, 2001;Edward & Chapman, 2011). This is not surprising, as males can expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is evidence of intersexual selection including female- and male-mate choice ( Friberg and Arnqvist 2003 ; LeVasseur-Viens et al 2015 ). In the latter case, if males favor larger females, a choice that may correlate with female fecundity in species where body size correlates positively with ovariole number ( Bonduriansky 2001 ; Byrne and Rice 2006 ; Sinclair et al 2021 ), then this could result in positive selection on amino acid changes favoring increased ovariole numbers. Moreover, Drosophila exhibits sexual antagonism, which could also potentially shape female (and male) reproductive characteristics and their underlying genes ( Arnqvist and Rock 1995 ; Rice 1996 ; Swanson et al 2004 ; Innocenti and Morrow 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is evidence of intersexual selection including female- and male-mate choice ( Friberg and Arnqvist 2003 ; LeVasseur-Viens et al 2015 ). In the latter case, if males favor larger females, a choice that may correlate with female fecundity in species where body size correlates positively with ovariole number ( Bonduriansky 2001 ; Byrne and Rice 2006 ; Sinclair et al 2021 ), then this could result in positive selection on amino acid changes favoring increased ovariole numbers. Moreover, Drosophila exhibits sexual antagonism, which could also potentially shape female (and male) reproductive characteristics and their underlying genes ( Arnqvist and Rock 1995 ; Rice 1996 ; Swanson et al 2004 ; Innocenti and Morrow 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found no size difference between mated and unmated female flies. Although male mating size bias for larger females is evident across many insect species (Bonduriansky 2001; Sinclair, Lisa, & Pischedda 2021), this possibility remains rarely researched in comparison with the well demonstrated female choice of males found in other fly groups such as lek forming fruit fly species (Shelly 2018). Perching sites have been found to significantly increase mating in medfly mass rearing systems that are known to perch, like male E. tenax , in the field (Fitzpatrick 1979; Liedo et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is evidence of intersexual selection including female- and male-mate choice (Friberg and Arnqvist 2003; LeVasseur-Viens, et al 2015). In the latter case, if males favor larger females, a choice that may correlate with female fecundity in species where body size correlates positively with ovariole number (Bonduriansky 2001; Byrne and Rice 2006; Sinclair, et al 2021), then this could result in positive selection on amino acid changes favoring increased ovariole numbers. Moreover, Drosophila exhibits sexual antagonism, which could also potentially shape female (and male) reproductive characteristics and their underlying genes (Arnqvist 1995; Rice 1996; Swanson, et al 2004; Innocenti and Morrow 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%