2017
DOI: 10.1101/170381
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does size matter? The relationship between predictive power of single-subject morphometric networks to spatial scale and edge weight

Abstract: Network-level analysis based on anatomical covariance (cortical thickness) has been gaining increasing popularity recently. However, there has not been a systematic study of the impact of spatial scale and edge definitions on predictive performance. In order to obtain a clear understanding of relative performance, there is a need for systematic comparison. In this study, we present a histogram-based approach to construct subjectwise weighted networks that enable a principled comparison across different methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we individualize this approach to enable extraction of single-subject network features, they further enriched insights into abnormalities due to disease (Tijms, Seriès, Willshaw, & Lawrie, 2012,Raamana et al (2015, Palaniyappan, Park, Balain, Dangi, & Liddle (2015), Xu et al (2017)). Moreover, these network-level features demonstrated potential for prognostic applications (Raamana et al, 2015,Raamana et al (2014), in addition to being robust to changes in scale and edge weight metrics (Raamana & Strother, 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we individualize this approach to enable extraction of single-subject network features, they further enriched insights into abnormalities due to disease (Tijms, Seriès, Willshaw, & Lawrie, 2012,Raamana et al (2015, Palaniyappan, Park, Balain, Dangi, & Liddle (2015), Xu et al (2017)). Moreover, these network-level features demonstrated potential for prognostic applications (Raamana et al, 2015,Raamana et al (2014), in addition to being robust to changes in scale and edge weight metrics (Raamana & Strother, 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network-level analysis of various features, especially if it can be individualized for a singlesubject, is proving to be a valuable tool in many applications (Raamana and Strother 2017;Evans 2013;Palaniyappan et al 2015;Tijms et al 2012;Xu et al 2017;Raamana et al 2015;Lerch et al 2006;He, Chen, and Evans 2007). This package extracts single-subject (individualized, or intrinsic) networks from node-wise data by computing the edge weights based on histogram distance between the distributions of values within each node.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%