2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does slow embryo development predict a high aneuploidy rate on trophectoderm biopsy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with those of Haas et al who recently demonstrated that clinical pregnancy rates following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts frozen on day 5 than on day 6 [23]. Impaired implantation of slow developing cleavage stage embryos may be linked to high rates of aneuploidy in day-6 embryos [24] especially in older women [25].…”
Section: Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer Outcomessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are in line with those of Haas et al who recently demonstrated that clinical pregnancy rates following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts frozen on day 5 than on day 6 [23]. Impaired implantation of slow developing cleavage stage embryos may be linked to high rates of aneuploidy in day-6 embryos [24] especially in older women [25].…”
Section: Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer Outcomessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A recent study has shown that EBs that became FEBs on day 6 were less likely to be euploid compared to FEBs on day 5 (23 vs. 41%, p < 0.05) [23]. A second study demonstrated similar results, with a higher aneuploidy rate of EBs compared to those of FEBs (70 vs. 61%, p < 0.05) [24]. However, other studies showed similar aneuploidy rates between day 5 and day 6 FEBs [15,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although there was a trend to increased live birth rate with Day 5 blastocysts, this effect was lost when the analysis included blastocyst quality. More recent studies indicate that Day 5 blastocysts may be superior to Day 6 blastocysts, although this difference appears to be lost when euploid embryos are transferred (Capalbo et al , 2014; Piccolomini et al , 2016). The developmental potential of Day 7 blastocysts relative to Day 5/6 blastocysts is likely reduced but the data available are limited (Richter et al , 2006; Hiraoka et al , 2009; Kovalevsky et al , 2013).…”
Section: Blastocyst Grades and Rank Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of grade ‘C’ blastocysts adds an additional layer of uncertainty in the context of Day 7 blastocysts and requires careful consideration. Furthermore, since slow development in older patients is associated with higher aneuploidy rates (Campbell et al , 2014; Piccolomini et al , 2016), guidelines for freezing slow growing blastocysts should be relative to age.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%