Abstract:Sixty obstetric patients were enrolled in the study to examine the possible effects of spinal anesthesia on their hearing. By using an audiometer, the patient's hearing was evaluated before delivery, after delivery, and for the following 2 days. There was no significant change of hearing in any of the patients.
“…The magnitude of change in hearing threshold was statistically significant but small (Tables 2 and 4), as with earlier studies documenting postspinal hearing loss [9,10,16]. Intravascular volume replacement affects post-spinal hearing loss [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…If the postoperative dB level was significantly higher than the preoperative value, it signified a change in hearing ability [9]. In Group S, there was a significant increase in the postoperative mean hearing threshold at 500 Hz (right ear) as compared with the preoperative hearing threshold ( Table 2; P b 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Clinically significant hearing loss was defined as a change of more than 10 dB loss in ≥ two frequencies [9]. The number of patients who exhibited such a postoperative decrease in hearing ability was not statistically different: 2/ 15 in Group S (-15 dB and -35 dB loss) and 0/15 in Group E. Of the two Group S patients, one patient also complained of postdural puncture headache on the first postoperative day, which subsided by the next day with conservative therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no uniform criterion for defining hearing loss in previous studies [5,9,[11][12][13]. To define a significant decrease in hearing threshold, we used comparison of preoperative with postoperative threshold.…”
“…The magnitude of change in hearing threshold was statistically significant but small (Tables 2 and 4), as with earlier studies documenting postspinal hearing loss [9,10,16]. Intravascular volume replacement affects post-spinal hearing loss [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…If the postoperative dB level was significantly higher than the preoperative value, it signified a change in hearing ability [9]. In Group S, there was a significant increase in the postoperative mean hearing threshold at 500 Hz (right ear) as compared with the preoperative hearing threshold ( Table 2; P b 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Clinically significant hearing loss was defined as a change of more than 10 dB loss in ≥ two frequencies [9]. The number of patients who exhibited such a postoperative decrease in hearing ability was not statistically different: 2/ 15 in Group S (-15 dB and -35 dB loss) and 0/15 in Group E. Of the two Group S patients, one patient also complained of postdural puncture headache on the first postoperative day, which subsided by the next day with conservative therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no uniform criterion for defining hearing loss in previous studies [5,9,[11][12][13]. To define a significant decrease in hearing threshold, we used comparison of preoperative with postoperative threshold.…”
“…They suggested that the explanation of the hearing loss could be a biological mechanism similar to endolymphatic hydrops, resulting from perilymphatic hypotension due to ''loss of liquor during and after the spinal anaesthesia''. However, Finegold et al [9] tested the hypothesis that women undergoing elective caesarean delivery with a subarachnoid block (SAB) suggesting that they may experience hearing loss due to lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid leakage causing hypoacusis. They could find no difference in the hearing levels in the period immediately before and 2 days after the caesarean.…”
Our case demonstrates that pregnancy can lead to hearing loss in two sequential pregnancies. Mechanisms are discussed in detail. Clinically it appears that the hearing loss and tinnitus associated with pregnancy can spontaneously recover.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.