2015
DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2014.994230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does state-level context matter for individuals' knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the ‘red states v. blue states’ hypothesis

Abstract: Recently, the hypothesis that state-level political context influences individuals' cultural values--the 'red states v. blue states' hypothesis--has been invoked to explain the hyper-polarisation of politics in the USA. To test this hypothesis, we examined individuals' knowledge about abortion in relation to the political context of their current state of residence. Drawing from an internet-survey of 586 reproductive-age individuals in the USA, we assessed two types of abortion knowledge: health-related and le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings mirror other studies that have highlighted pervasive misperceptions about the physical and emotional risks of abortion among the general public and, more importantly, among women presenting for an abortion (Bessett et al, 2015;Kavanaugh et al, 2013;Littman et al, 2014;Wiebe et al, 2014). The extent that our study indicates a lower prevalence of misinformation may be due to differences in study populations, but is more likely due to our inclusion of a "don't know/unsure" response option rather than using a dichotomous true/false measure.…”
Section: /12/17supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings mirror other studies that have highlighted pervasive misperceptions about the physical and emotional risks of abortion among the general public and, more importantly, among women presenting for an abortion (Bessett et al, 2015;Kavanaugh et al, 2013;Littman et al, 2014;Wiebe et al, 2014). The extent that our study indicates a lower prevalence of misinformation may be due to differences in study populations, but is more likely due to our inclusion of a "don't know/unsure" response option rather than using a dichotomous true/false measure.…”
Section: /12/17supporting
confidence: 85%
“…(See Table 1.) These five myths are frequently presented in state-mandated documents (Guttmacher Institute, 2016) and have been considered in prior research (Bessett et al, 2015;Littman et al, 2014;Wiebe et al, 2014). "Don't know/not sure" was offered as a response option for each item.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional apprehension about the safety of these alternative models of care likely stems from limited knowledge regarding the safety, effectiveness and process of having a medication abortion, and misperceptions that an abortion requires inclinic screening to be safe. People tend to be less knowledgeable about abortion than other RH care topics [24] and tend to overestimate the physical and psychological risks of an abortion [25,26]. Women's knowledge about the safety of abortion may be compromised in part by exposure to messages that exaggerate the risks of abortion, including mandated counseling laws in some states that require that the risks of abortion be overstated or which mandate discussion of scientifically inaccurate information [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women were asked about their relationship status with the man involved in the pregnancy and his awareness of and support for the abortion, as well as who they had talked to about their abortion decision. To capture levels of misperceptions about abortion, women were presented with a series of statements summarizing common abortion myths derived from previous research [18][19][20] and asked which statement was closer to the truth (e.g., "abortion causes breast cancer" versus "abortion does NOT cause breast cancer," see Table 1 for all myths presented). Women who incorrectly identified the myth as closer to the truth, or responded "Don't know," were categorized as endorsing that myth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%