2015
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1500126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does stronger pollen competition improve offspring fitness when pollen load does not vary?

Abstract: These results suggest that limited within-donor variation in genetic quality of pollen grains reduces the potential benefits of pollen competition in the study population. The lack of paternal effects on early sporophyte performance further suggests that benefits of pollen competition among pollen from multiple donors should be limited as well, and it raises questions about the significance of pollen competition as a mechanism of sexual selection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
27
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
27
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While Armbruster and Rogers () observed an increase in seed mass with increasing intensity of competition among self‐pollen, Opedal, Armbruster, and Pélabon () found no effect of increased competition intensity among either self‐ or cross‐pollen on offspring quantity or quality. The latter results were confirmed by Pélabon et al () who found no effect of variation in the dispersion of pollen on the stigmatic surface on seed mass and seedling performance. However, in contrast to Armbruster and Rogers (), Opedal et al () and Pélabon et al () did not control for the distance the pollen tubes grew.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Armbruster and Rogers () observed an increase in seed mass with increasing intensity of competition among self‐pollen, Opedal, Armbruster, and Pélabon () found no effect of increased competition intensity among either self‐ or cross‐pollen on offspring quantity or quality. The latter results were confirmed by Pélabon et al () who found no effect of variation in the dispersion of pollen on the stigmatic surface on seed mass and seedling performance. However, in contrast to Armbruster and Rogers (), Opedal et al () and Pélabon et al () did not control for the distance the pollen tubes grew.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The latter results were confirmed by Pélabon et al () who found no effect of variation in the dispersion of pollen on the stigmatic surface on seed mass and seedling performance. However, in contrast to Armbruster and Rogers (), Opedal et al () and Pélabon et al () did not control for the distance the pollen tubes grew.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Such patterns are common for life‐history traits (Houle, ), but it is not entirely clear how this affects their evolutionary dynamics. Low additive genetic variance in seed size has been commonly reported (e.g., Schwaegerle & Levin, ; Pélabon, Albertsen, Falahati‐Anbaran, Wright, & Armbruster, ; Pélabon et al, ) and may constrain the evolution of germination behavior mediated by seed size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would also be of great interest to evaluate mate choice in fruits sired by multiple pollen donors (cf. Pélabon et al ) under varying resource conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%