2012
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.715185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does stump removal affect early growth and mycorrhizal infection of spruce (Picea abies) seedlings in clear-cuts?

Abstract: Stump removal procedure increases the extent of exposed mineral soil in the clear felled areas. In this study, our aim was to find out whether the early growth and mycorrhization of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings differ between stump removal and mounding sites. Stumps were harvested from five one-hectare study sites and other five sites were mounded after clear felling. Twenty seedlings were planted on mounds at each study site. Although the height of spruce seedlings did not differ between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All in all, harvesting stump–root systems may have, but not always (e.g. Kataja‐Aho et al ., ; Malmström, ), negative impacts on forest functioning through modifications of, for instance, soil nutrient leaching (Staaf & Olsson, ; Ahtiainen & Huttunen, ; Zabowski et al ., ), soil microorganisms and fauna (Kataja‐Aho et al ., ; Ols et al ., ), and forest flora (Kaye et al ., ). It is possible to limit these effects by reducing the soil surface which is disturbed as much as possible (see recommendations of maximum of soil surface disturbance in Berch et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All in all, harvesting stump–root systems may have, but not always (e.g. Kataja‐Aho et al ., ; Malmström, ), negative impacts on forest functioning through modifications of, for instance, soil nutrient leaching (Staaf & Olsson, ; Ahtiainen & Huttunen, ; Zabowski et al ., ), soil microorganisms and fauna (Kataja‐Aho et al ., ; Ols et al ., ), and forest flora (Kaye et al ., ). It is possible to limit these effects by reducing the soil surface which is disturbed as much as possible (see recommendations of maximum of soil surface disturbance in Berch et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our data, T. terrestris 1 was the dominant OTU in the harvesting treatments, whereas o3% of this OTU's sequences occurred in reference forests. Abundance of T. terrestris in harvesting treatments was almost as high as the root colonization rate of this species in seedlings grown in the same nursery (Kataja-aho et al, 2012), which provided seedling material for South and Central areas in the present study. However, after three growing seasons no effect on fungal OTU assemblages was found that could be attributed to the two different nurseries (Joroinen for the South and Central areas and Tuusniemi for the North area).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We detected only slightly increased shoot biomass in the treatment, including stump and logging residue removal (SRP) compared with patch mounding. Previous studies show that stump removal may increase growth of Norway spruce seedlings and suggest increased availability of soluble nutrients in soil (Menkis et al, 2010) or high EMF colonization received from nursery (Kataja-aho et al, 2012) to be plausible reasons. However, slight differences in tree sapling growth may become even less apparent in the long term, as has been observed during 10 (Hope, 2007) and 30 years (Karlsson and Tamminen, 2013) of monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations