2007
DOI: 10.3844/jssp.2007.197.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Subjective Class Predict the Causal Attribution for Poverty?

Abstract: This study investigated the attributions for poverty among secondary school and university students in relation to socio-economic. The questionnaire was adapted from Feagin's [1] and Abouchedid & Nasser [2] , and included 15-item poverty questionnaire. It was administered to a sample (n = 242) of secondary school and university students from public and private schools and universities in Lebanon. Findings showed that Lebanese youth were more inclined to attribute poverty to structural factors. Socioeconomic va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some research (Bullock, 1999; Cozzarelli et al, 2001; Shirazi & Biel, 2005) has indicated that men, European Americans, persons of higher social class, and more educated individuals are more likely to have internal attributions of social class in comparison to women, non-European Americans, and individuals who are from lower social classes or less educated. In contrast, other research (e.g., Nasser, 2007; Reutter et al, 2006) has demonstrated that these demographic characteristics are not important predictors of attributions.…”
Section: Attributions Of Social Classcontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some research (Bullock, 1999; Cozzarelli et al, 2001; Shirazi & Biel, 2005) has indicated that men, European Americans, persons of higher social class, and more educated individuals are more likely to have internal attributions of social class in comparison to women, non-European Americans, and individuals who are from lower social classes or less educated. In contrast, other research (e.g., Nasser, 2007; Reutter et al, 2006) has demonstrated that these demographic characteristics are not important predictors of attributions.…”
Section: Attributions Of Social Classcontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Cross-cultural investigations have demonstrated that U.S. participants tend to attribute low-income status to individualistic or internal factors (e.g., Bullock, Williams, & Limbert, 2003; Cozzarelli et al, 2001; Kluegel & Smith, 1986) whereas non-U.S. participants tend to attribute it to external or structural factors (e.g., Nasser, 2007). Within the U.S., examining specific demographic characteristics has produced conflicting findings.…”
Section: Attributions Of Social Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullock, Williams, and Limbert (2003) had students evaluate 45 separate causes of poverty and found that, despite the diversity of these explanations, they loaded onto three distinct factors reflecting (a) individualistic, (b) structural (i.e., society), and (c) fatalistic causes. Others have shown similar factor structures to people's attributions for poverty in various countries including (a) Ethiopia (Wollie, 2009), (b) Finland (Niemela, 2008), (c) Lebanon (Abouchedid & Nasser, 2002;Nasser, 2007), and Turkey (Morçöl, 1997). Thus, the ability to reduce various idiosyncratic attributions for poverty into three themes holds across cultures.…”
Section: Attributions For Povertymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Further, he believes that the nonpoor view the poor as receiving their ''just deserts'' and feel angry toward the poor for not being more successful. In contrast, those who live in non-Western societies seem more inclined to support structural explanations of poverty (Abouchedid & Nasser, 2001;Nasser, 2007).…”
Section: Empathy Cognitive Distancing and Povertymentioning
confidence: 98%