2018
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2018.1489209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does technical drawing increase students’ mental rotation ability?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial ability of the participants was assessed using a shortened version of the standardized, redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse MRT (Peters et al, 1995). The reported Kuder–Richardson 20 (KR20) estimate of reliability coefficients has been reported to be 0.83 (Ogunkola and Knight, 2018). The first 12 questions from the test were used as was done in a previous study (Cherdieu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial ability of the participants was assessed using a shortened version of the standardized, redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse MRT (Peters et al, 1995). The reported Kuder–Richardson 20 (KR20) estimate of reliability coefficients has been reported to be 0.83 (Ogunkola and Knight, 2018). The first 12 questions from the test were used as was done in a previous study (Cherdieu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of MRT scores in females and males in the art‐training group, when compared to the control group, aligns with data from past research studies that support the improvement of spatial visualization test performance with training (Embertson, 1987; Baenninger and Newcombe, 1989; Prieto and Velasco, 2009; Giesecke et al, 2016) and specifically studies that supported technical drawing as a means of training spatial visualization. (Akasah and Alias, 2010; Ogunkola and Knight, 2018). The improvement is also reflective of the nature of the test that has a strong practice element (Vandenberg and Kuse, 1978; Peters et al, 1995; Terlecki et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion was that the improvement occurred independently of the indirect training. The analysis from Ogunkola and Knight indicated that technical drawing students (mean 4.81, SD ± 1.04) performed better on the MRT than those in the control group (mean = 4.18, SD ± 0.83) with a significant difference of moderate size between the two groups ( ηp2 = 0.08, P < 0.0005) (Ogunkola and Knight, 2018). A study by Akasah and Alias (2010) also supported that engineering drawing could be used as a learning tool for spatial visualization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous authors observed that students in technical careers and vocational training programs require spatial skills to succeed academically in Technical Drawing subjects [20,[28][29][30][31][32]. Saorín-Pérez et al [18], in addition to confirming this relationship specifically in engineering degrees, found that studying Technical Drawing improves mental rotation skills [33], while other studies also highlight its positive effects on learning in other engineering subjects [24,34]. In summary, Technical Drawing is closely linked to spatial skills and holds significant relevance in both engineering studies and professional fields.…”
Section: Spatial Skills In Engineering Studies and In Graphical Expre...mentioning
confidence: 98%