2015
DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2015.1057002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does technological innovation undertaken alone have a real pivotal role? Product and marketing innovation in manufacturing firms

Abstract: This paper investigates the role of non-technological innovation on firms' innovation propensity and performance. We note that emphasis on technological innovation alone is misleading, as a firm's decision to undertake technological innovation brings about a more complex and general process which may involve new attitudes regarding organization and market orientation. We analyse the relationship between product and marketing innovation in manufacturing, focusing specifically on the food industry. We propose a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because a weaker effect of marketing innovation activities was found in the product innovation equation. This means that marketing innovations benefit from product innovation activities (Bartoloni and Baussola 2016). That is why this paper uses the bivariate equation in the innovation output stage of the innovation business process and adds as many reasonable control variables as possible to account for industry-specific factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because a weaker effect of marketing innovation activities was found in the product innovation equation. This means that marketing innovations benefit from product innovation activities (Bartoloni and Baussola 2016). That is why this paper uses the bivariate equation in the innovation output stage of the innovation business process and adds as many reasonable control variables as possible to account for industry-specific factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third variable is a dummy variable equal to 1 if a firm has technological or R&D department or committee in period t-1, and zero otherwise (variable R&D departmen t-1 ) [54]. In accounting for the market power of firms, we model their market share (variable Market share t-1 ) as the weighted sum of a firm's market shares in markets in which the firm sells its products in period t-1 [66,67]. This variable is included to test the hypothesis advanced by [68] known as Mark II or the classical Schumpeterian hypothesis [69].…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that innovation activities of individual firms that belong to a group can benefit from the opportunities arising from organizational synergies within the group. Moreover, firms belonging to a group might have an easier access to external funding [66]. Firms' international activities are captured by the variable Export intensity t-1 , as the ratio of exports to sale in period t-1 [32,58,64].…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With highly integrated supply chains and increasing exports (Marras et al, ; AA.VV., ), food firms hold meaningful and long‐term business relationships with other sectors such as producers of inputs and services, contractors, feed manufacturers, food processing firms, distribution and catering, which all together are worth almost €267 billion (approximately 17 per cent of national GDP) (Marras et al, ). Recent quantitative studies confirm that both technological innovations (i.e., product or process innovation) and non‐technological innovations (i.e., organizational or marketing innovation) are becoming central to the innovativeness of food firms (Bartoloni & Baussola, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%