1995
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199504000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Antiarrhythmic Effect of Ischemie Preconditioning in Rats Involve the L-Arginine Nitric Oxide Pathway?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of NO in the conventional no-flow ischaemia-induced preconditioning is controversial (Vegh et al 1992;Weselcouch et al 1995;Lu et al 1995), however, our previous studies support a role of the NO-cGMP system in pacing-induced preconditioning in rabbits and rats (Ferdinandy et al 1996;Szilvassy et al 1994a, b). The discrepancy may be explained by the different biochemical mechanisms in no-flow ischaemia-induced preconditioning and that induced by rapid pacing (Ferdinandy et al 1995b).…”
Section: No and Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of NO in the conventional no-flow ischaemia-induced preconditioning is controversial (Vegh et al 1992;Weselcouch et al 1995;Lu et al 1995), however, our previous studies support a role of the NO-cGMP system in pacing-induced preconditioning in rabbits and rats (Ferdinandy et al 1996;Szilvassy et al 1994a, b). The discrepancy may be explained by the different biochemical mechanisms in no-flow ischaemia-induced preconditioning and that induced by rapid pacing (Ferdinandy et al 1995b).…”
Section: No and Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The role of NO in the mechanism of preconditioning is controversial. Vegh et al (1992) found that the antiarrhythmic effect of preconditioning induced by short periods of coronary occlusion was abolished by administration of N Gnitro-L-arginine methyl ester in anaesthetized dogs; Lu et al (1995) and Weselcouch and associates (1995) could not confirm these results in anaesthetized rats and in isolated rat hearts. However, these studies focused on the antiarrhythmic effect of preconditioning induced by 'no-flow' ischaemia, and no direct measurement of myocardial NO was attempted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…34 Our present results support those of Vegh at al, 11 who demonstrated that 10 mg/kg LNA methyl ester abolished the antiarrhythmic effect of preconditioning in a coronary occlusion model in anesthetized dogs. However, studies by Lu et al 35 using 10 mg/kg N G -monomethyl-L-arginine or LNA methyl ester in anesthetized rats with coronary occlusion/ reperfusion and by Weselcouch et al 30 using 30 mol/L LNA methyl ester in isolated rat hearts showed, surprisingly, that the different NOS inhibitors did not interfere with the outcome of ischemia/reperfusion with or without preceding preconditioning as assessed by postischemic myocardial function, LDH release, 30 and arrhythmias. 35 Because NO generation was not determined and only a single dose of NOS inhibitor was used in these studies, it is difficult to interpret these negative results.…”
Section: No and Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the requirement for RNS in the triggering of preconditioning is controversial, as some groups find evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) during the early window of protection (21,32) but others do not (27). In cardiomyocytes, inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) with N -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) did not abolish the ROS signal during hypoxic triggering (42), which suggests that NO is not required for ROS generation during hypoxic triggering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%