1983
DOI: 10.1177/030089168306900105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Antitumoral Activity of Platinum(IV) Derivatives Result from their in Vivo Reduction?

Abstract: The antitumoral activity of some octahedral platinum(IV) and square-planar platinum(II) derivatives against Yoshida ascites tumor in the rat is reported. It is shown that only those octahedral platinum(IV) complexes which give active reduction products are active. These results support the hypothesis that the antitumor activity of octahedral complexes involves activation by in vivo reduction. Anticancer drugs functioning by this mechanism may be preferentially toxic to or may localize in hypoxic areas of tumor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite studies reporting in vitro binding of platinum(IV) species to nucleobase models in the absence of reductants [101-107], evidence that platinum(IV) species can enter cells [108], and that they can bind to DNA more slowly but at similar sites as their platinum(II) counterparts [109-111], it is believed that Pt IV is likely to be reduced before undergoing substitution [112]. Reduction to platinum(II) is probably essential for activation and effective antitumour activity of platinum(IV) complexes [113-118]. Platinum(IV) complexes would not be expected interact with nucleic acids in vivo due to the slow substitution kinetics compared to their reduction rates since substitution is slow.…”
Section: Photoactivatable Platinum(iv) Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite studies reporting in vitro binding of platinum(IV) species to nucleobase models in the absence of reductants [101-107], evidence that platinum(IV) species can enter cells [108], and that they can bind to DNA more slowly but at similar sites as their platinum(II) counterparts [109-111], it is believed that Pt IV is likely to be reduced before undergoing substitution [112]. Reduction to platinum(II) is probably essential for activation and effective antitumour activity of platinum(IV) complexes [113-118]. Platinum(IV) complexes would not be expected interact with nucleic acids in vivo due to the slow substitution kinetics compared to their reduction rates since substitution is slow.…”
Section: Photoactivatable Platinum(iv) Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pt(IV) complexes, compared to their Pt(II) counterparts, are extremely inert to substitution reactions, and increasing evidence suggests that for Pt(IV) diamines to be active, they must first be reduced by biological reductants [e.g., ascorbate or glutathione (GSH)] to the corresponding Pt(II) antitumor agent. 7c,d, Thus, Pt(IV) complexes may be regarded as inactive prodrugs. The covalent binding of Pt(II) to DNA is widely consider responsible for the therapeutic activity of these drugs (for recent reviews see ref ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reasoned that if the rate of reduction of Pt(IV) to Pt(II) could be increased in and around the tumor relative to normal tissue, then a more effective, less toxic therapy would be achieved. Along these lines, Kido et al8f showed recently that the combination of GSH with tetraplatin, a tetrachloroplatinum(IV) diamine, in a short-term (i.e., 2 h) in vitro treatment of L1210 cells leads to an increase in antiproliferative activity approaching that of the dichloroplatinum(II) diamine; that is the IC 50 value of tetraplatin decreases from 1.2 to 0.75 μM when 10 μM GSH is present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antitumor activity of platinum(1V) compounds has been suggested to require in vivo reduction to the kinetically more labile, and therefore reactive, platinum(I1) derivatives (Rotondo et al, 1983;Blatter et al, 1984;Eastman, 1987a;Pendyala et al, 1990). They have been considered as the compounds which are unable to react directly with DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%