Does the assumption of biogenic carbon neutrality affect decarbonization pathways? Lessons learned from a techno-economic analysis

Abstract

<p>Net-zero emission targets require transitioning to low carbon energy sources (including bioenergy) and large-scale carbon dioxide removal. Aside from direct air capture (DAC), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and terrestrial carbon removal and sequestration are two available negative emission technologies (NETs) ready for large-scale deployment. Nationally determined contributions endorse bioenergy as an alternative carbon neutral energy source for fossil fuels. However, this carbon neutral assumption is disputed with several studies indicating that it may lead to accounting errors and biased decision-making.</p> <p>Bottom-up techno-economic energy system models such as the TIMES framework are used to identify and analyze potential decarbonization pathways for countries or regions. However, these models do not include biogenic carbon flows. Biogenic carbon refers to the carbon contained in biomass. One could assume that biogenic carbon is neutral since the amount of carbon emitted into the atmosphere through biomass combustion and the amount of carbon sequestered by plants during their lifetimes are equal. This assumption may be acceptable when the biomass rotation length is short, as in annual crops, and the balance between emissions and uptakes is indeed neutral. The assumption, however, may not remain valid when the sequestration period is lengthy, as in the case of forest trees. This study combines an aspatial, stand- and landscape-level modeling framework (CBM-CFS3) with a bottom-up techno-economic energy system model (NATEM). We use the CBM-CFS3 output to model various forest management strategies that would result in different biomass availability for bioenergy as well as net forest carbon stocks and emissions. This allows us to determine whether and how this biomass will be used in the energy system over time. Besides, we model several forest-based bioenergy and BECCS technologies to allow the energy system to use the available biomass. This is the first time biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> flows are being modeled in a thorough energy system model such as TIMES. We show how the assumption of carbon neutrality results in biased decision-making (using different sets of NETs and resources). We demonstrate that the decarbonization effort could be reduced by integrating forest sequestration into the energy system model. We explore how a high sequestration capacity forest management strategy may minimize the need for expensive NETs such as DAC. Moreover, this research highlights the need to adopt the most promising forest management strategy before investing in BECCS.</p>