2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the bond strength of highly translucent zirconia show a different dependence on the airborne-particle abrasion parameters in comparison to conventional zirconia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the failure modes, the control group had a predominantly adhesive failure between zirconia and the resin cement in zirconia resin mode (ZRM), this was in agreement with Cheung & Botelho, and Zhao et al (28,32). Regarding the sandblasted and the etched groups, they showed variable intensities of the different types of failure modes, this was in agreement to Cho et al, and Zandparsa et al (15,37), that could be related to the improved showing some of the fractured enamel rods adhered to the resin cement remnants on the sandblasted disc specimen in enamel fracture mode (EFM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the failure modes, the control group had a predominantly adhesive failure between zirconia and the resin cement in zirconia resin mode (ZRM), this was in agreement with Cheung & Botelho, and Zhao et al (28,32). Regarding the sandblasted and the etched groups, they showed variable intensities of the different types of failure modes, this was in agreement to Cho et al, and Zandparsa et al (15,37), that could be related to the improved showing some of the fractured enamel rods adhered to the resin cement remnants on the sandblasted disc specimen in enamel fracture mode (EFM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, the control group (without any surface treatment) was compared to two types of surface treatment modalities that depend on micromechanical roughening of the zirconia surface (the sandblasting and etching procedures) (10). So far, for obtaining the maximum SBS to the high translucent zirconia, it was recommended to use the sandblasting with 110 µm particle size from 10 mm distance at 2 or 3 bar pressure, as stated by LE et al (17) and Zhao et al (32), respectively, while…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retention of zirconia restorations depends on the mechanical roughening of the surface and the chemical bonding with an acidic adhesive monomer such as 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) [9]. The most commonly used mechanical pretreatment to promote the bonding of resin cement to zirconia is the sandblasting of the interior surface of zirconia restorations with aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) particles [10]. The sandblasting technique can provide a clean and rough surface for micromechanical interlocking [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of APA with Al 2 O 3 particles is popular for the treatment of zirconia surfaces in order to increase the bond strength, studies have shown that the increased roughness imparted by this technique is accompanied by an increased fracture risk, thereby weakening the structure through the introduction of microcracks [26][27][28]. The results of our study demonstrated that FSL-treated translucent zirconia showed significantly higher mean R a values than those in the APA and NT groups, and there was no significant difference in the R a value between the APA and NT groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%