2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the change of official promotion assessment standards contribute to the improvement of urban environmental quality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The local governments gradually showed a certain preference for fiscal governance for the construction of an ecological civilization. Local governments, under the exogenous pressure of senior government, may show certain "environmental federalism" decision-making tendencies; however, contrary to the view of "environmental federalism", it is believed that the local governments' motives to protect the regional ecological environment and improve regional energy efficiency are derived from higher government rather than immigration [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The local governments gradually showed a certain preference for fiscal governance for the construction of an ecological civilization. Local governments, under the exogenous pressure of senior government, may show certain "environmental federalism" decision-making tendencies; however, contrary to the view of "environmental federalism", it is believed that the local governments' motives to protect the regional ecological environment and improve regional energy efficiency are derived from higher government rather than immigration [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Second, with the rise of emerging technologies such as industrial robots, big data, cloud computing and artificial intelligence, whether technological innovation can provide new impetus for energy conservation and emission reduction has become a hot research topic (Su et al, 2020;Prasath Kumar et al, 2021;Wang K-L et al, 2021;Li N et al, 2022;Saheb et al, 2022). The improvement of cleaner production technology can reduce carbon emissions in the process of production of enterprises and reduce carbon emissions per unit of output (Zhou and Zhao, 2016;Zhou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Kuang et al (2022) explored the impact of green technology innovation and renewable energy investments on reducing carbon emissions and found that in the long-term technology innovation can enhance carbon performance. However, studies have also shown that technology innovations increase the risk of enterprises, and the returns to enterprises are particularly limited (Li W et al, 2022;Su and Fan, 2022). Shaikh and Randhawa (2022) found that open technological innovation can also create risks within the organization that can jeopardize the company's operations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, at least in the short-term, the implementation of environmental regulation may reduce the production efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises, which has been confirmed by Walley and Whitehead (1994), Gray and Shadbegian (2003), and other scholars. On the contrary, the "Porter hypothesis" proposed that strict and appropriate environmental regulations could improve their production efficiency through such transmission channels as innovation offset effect and optimal allocation of resources (Porter and Van der Linde, 1995;Li N et al, 2022;Peng and Zhang, 2022). In addition, there are also a few studies combining these two views that environmental regulation only plays a positive role in specific areas due to differences in policy choice timing and institutional environment (Berman and Bui, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%