PurposeThis study was aimed to compare the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes between symmetric and asymmetric extension and mediolateral gap balance after navigation‐assisted (NA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ultracongruent (UC) insets and the medial stabilising technique (MST).
MethodsIn all, 363 knees of 275 patients who underwent mechanical alignment‐target NA TKA with MST between January 2015 and December 2017 were analysed. Patients were divided into balanced (extension mediolateral gap difference ≤ 2 mm) and tight medial (difference ≥ 3 mm) groups. Pre‐ and postoperative clinical, functional (range of motion, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis [WOMAC] index, Knee Society Knee Score [KSKS], and Knee Society Function Score [KSFS]) and radiographic (hip–knee–ankle [HKA] angle, femoral condylar offset, extension angle [a minus indicates hyperextension], and joint line distance) outcomes were compared between the groups. Student’s t‐ or Chi‐squared test was used to compare the outcomes.
ResultsAmong the 363 knees analysed, 279 (77%) were assigned to the balanced group and 84 (23%) to the tight medial group. The preoperative HKA angle was significantly greater in the tight medial group than in the balanced group (9.7° ± 4.1° vs 14.3° ± 4.7°, P < 0.001). The postoperative WOMAC index, KSKS, and KSFS were similar between the groups. The change in the joint line distance was not significantly different (1.5 ± 3.7 vs 2.0 ± 3.3; n.s).
ConclusionThe clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes, including joint line distance, were comparable between the tight medial and balanced group after mechanical alignment‐targeted UC TKA with MST.
Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.