2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the euro dominate Central and Eastern European money markets?

Abstract: The so-called German Dominance Hypothesis (GDH) claimed that Bundesbank policies were transmitted into other European Monetary System (EMS) interest rates during the pre-euro era. We reformulate this hypothesis for the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries that are on the verge of accessing the eurozone. We test this "Euro Dominance Hypothesis (EDH)" in a novel way using a global vector autoregressive (GVAR) approach that combines country-specific error correction models in a global system. We find that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the results confirm the euro dominance hypothesis as the Euribor is very significant for the determination of Pribor in the long run. This result is in line with analyses done with different method (Kadow et al, 2013). Once the cointegrating vector was identified, the second part of monetary policy independence hypothesis consists of testing the weak exogeneity of Euribor in the VECM model.…”
Section: Empirical Model Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, the results confirm the euro dominance hypothesis as the Euribor is very significant for the determination of Pribor in the long run. This result is in line with analyses done with different method (Kadow et al, 2013). Once the cointegrating vector was identified, the second part of monetary policy independence hypothesis consists of testing the weak exogeneity of Euribor in the VECM model.…”
Section: Empirical Model Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Other explanation of this counter intuitive result relates to the data frequency. Usually the monthly data are used in analyses of longrun monetary convergence (Kadow et al, 2013). The monthly data for interest rates should portray the long-run relationships to a much greater extent (Hakkio, Rush, 1991) given the noise and jumps in daily interest rates volatility, and we conclude, that this is in fact the case.…”
Section: Empirical Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations