Does the Great Fire Wall cause self-censorship? The effects of perceived internet regulation and the justification of regulation

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of internet censorship, which is represented by the Great Fire Wall, on Chinese internet users’ self-censorship. Design/methodology/approach A 3×2 factorial experiment (n=315) is designed. Different patterns of censorship (soft censorship, compared censorship, and hard censorship) and the justification of internet regulation are involved in the experiment as two factors. The dependent variable is self-censorship which is measured through the willingness to speak about sensitive issues and the behavior of refusing to sign petitions with true names. Findings The results show that perceived internet censorship significantly decreases the willingness to talk about sensitive issues and the likelihood of signing petitions with true names. The justification of censorship significantly decreases self-censorship on the behaviors of petition signing. Although there are different patterns of internet censorship that Chinese netizens may encounter, they do not differ from each other in causing different levels of self-censorship. Research limitations/implications The subjects are college students who were born in the early 1990s, and the characteristics of this generation may influence the results of the experiment. The measurement of self-censorship could be refined. Originality/value The study contributes to the body of literature about internet regulation because it identifies a causal relationship between the government’s internet censorship system and ordinary people’s reaction to the regulation in an authoritarian regime. Unpacking different patterns of censorship and different dimensions of self-censorship depicts the complexity of censoring and being censored.

Self-censorship in social networking sites (SNSs) – privacy concerns, privacy awareness, perceived vulnerability and information management

“…For Xu et al (2008), in the context of e-commerce, at least, individuals' PA positively influences their disposition to value privacy. Zhong et al (2017) research identified a causal relationship between the Chinese government's internet censorship system and ordinary Chinese people's reactionsperceived internet censorship significantly decreases the willingness to discuss sensitive issues. Snowden (2015), when discussing in an online Q&A session on internet surveillance, stated, "The biggest change (caused by his leaking of sensitive government surveillance information) has been in awareness".…”

Interacting effects of political social media use, political discussion and political trust on civic engagement: Extending the differential gains model

“…The complexity of China also pertains to the high costs of civic engagement. Gradually, self-censorship has become common among Chinese people, which translated into their vigilance and reluctance to civic engagement (Zhong et al., 2017). Considering such contextual sophistication, the case of China offers the potential to further test the differential gains effects.…”

Technology and Collective Action Event Size: Lessons for India

“…From the citizen perspective, Indians are facing increasing uncertainty about the nature of civil liberties (Varshney, 2019). This may encourage individuals to use private social media and to make strategic decisions about what they report on public social media (Zhong et al, 2017).…”