2003
DOI: 10.1017/s095283690300373x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the handedness of the pebble crab Eriphia smithii influence its attack success on two dextral snail species?

Abstract: The predaceous crab Eriphia smithii (Xanthidae) has one larger claw with molar teeth on either the right or the left cheliped, which it uses to crush the shell of prey. Whether the handedness of crabs affected successful predation on two snail species, Nerita albicilla (Neritidae) and Planaxis sulcatus (Planaxidae) was experimentally investigated. The fate of snails of each species was analysed by multiple logistic regression with three explanatory variables: handedness, shell-size index and individuality of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ng and Tan, 1985;Dietl and Hendricks, 2006). In the xanthid crab Eriphia smithii, lefthanded crabs had more difficulty in breaking the shell aperture of large individuals of the dextrally coiled snail Planaxix sulcatus (Shigemiya, 2003). However, left-handedness may not have any disadvantage for left-handed crabs in either feeding or agonistic behaviour (Ladle and Todd, 2006).…”
Section: Shell-cracking Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ng and Tan, 1985;Dietl and Hendricks, 2006). In the xanthid crab Eriphia smithii, lefthanded crabs had more difficulty in breaking the shell aperture of large individuals of the dextrally coiled snail Planaxix sulcatus (Shigemiya, 2003). However, left-handedness may not have any disadvantage for left-handed crabs in either feeding or agonistic behaviour (Ladle and Todd, 2006).…”
Section: Shell-cracking Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another marked contrast to primary asymmetry, secondary asymmetry has frequently evolved from symmetry as well as through polarity reversal (Palmer, 2004). Thus, the polarity of the secondary asymmetry is far more variable among species, as in bivalve shells (Odhner, 1919) and flounder eyes (Policansky, 1982), and within species, as in crab claw (Shigemiya, 2003) and fish body shape (Nakajima et al, 2007).…”
Section: Evolution Of Lr Reversal In the Secondary Asymmetry Of Snailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Handling time of T. fluviatilis prey against A carapace width and B average chela height for E. sinensis operculum which required more time. In comparison, whilst handling snails, other crab species primarily crush the shell rather than pull the flesh from the aperture which shortens handling time (Zipser & Vermeji, 1978;Bertness & Cunningham, 1981;Schindler et al, 1994;Shigemiya, 2003;Rochette et al, 2007). This behaviour of crushing a molluscan shell may not be possible in sub-adult E. sinensis as they do not possess a distinct crushing chela, and also, in the present study, the crabs were relatively small individuals (10-40 mm carapace width).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Ozius verreauxii Saussure, 1853 and Eriphia squamata Stimpson, 1860, whilst failing to crush the snail shell, break only the shelf of the shell allowing them to remove the operculum and then remove the flesh from the shell (Bertness & Cunningham, 1981). Another technique is used by E. smithii MacLeay, 1838, and here the crab would break away the shell from the lip of the aperture until it could remove the flesh (Shigemiya, 2003). A possible Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%