2003
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Harvard/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ambient Particle Concentrator Change the Toxic Potential of Particles?

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ambient fine particles were concentrated using the Harvard ambient particle concentrator (HAPC), the characteristics of which have been described in detail previously (Godleski et al, 2000;Lawrence et al, 2004;Savage et al, 2003). Briefly, the HAPC concentrates ambient fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm (PM 2.5 ) to ∼30× ambient levels without altering its size distribution or chemical composition.…”
Section: Exposure Technology and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambient fine particles were concentrated using the Harvard ambient particle concentrator (HAPC), the characteristics of which have been described in detail previously (Godleski et al, 2000;Lawrence et al, 2004;Savage et al, 2003). Briefly, the HAPC concentrates ambient fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm (PM 2.5 ) to ∼30× ambient levels without altering its size distribution or chemical composition.…”
Section: Exposure Technology and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSHA has been studied in the past and has shown no effect on breathing pattern during inhalation studies at higher doses than used in this study (Martin et al, 1986, Raub et al, 1985, Wiester et al, 1985). Some mild inflammatory effects have been shown after high dose instillation studies (Martin et al, 1986, Raub et al, 1985, Sanders et al, 1982, Vallyathan et al, 1983), but not after inhalation studies (Savage et al, 2003, Raub et al, 1985). Therefore, the breathing pattern changes produced by P+MSHA exposure are most likely the result of the tailpipe emissions rather than the MSHA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mt St Helens Ash (MSHA) (density, ρ p = 2.6 g/cm 3 ) was used as a seed particle because it is both chemically and toxicologically inert (Martin et al, 1986, Raub et al, 1985, Savage et al, 2003, Wiester et al, 1985). The seed aerosol was added to decrease the time required to form a stable accumulation mode size distribution, and to allow exposures to both types of atmospheres (primary and secondary) to be conducted with mass concentrations on the same order of magnitude.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mid-1990s, the development of virtual impactor particle concentrators and centrifugal particle concentrators allowed inhalation exposures to ambient particles at concentrations 10 to 100-fold higher than found in ambient air. These concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) represent the naturally occurring PM mixture, and thus represent the most realistic PM exposure possible (Sioutas et al, 1995;Green and Armstrong, 2003;Demokritou et al, 2003;Savage et al, 2003). Airborne gases are not concentrated, allowing the researcher to test the effects of realtime exposures of animals to a particle mixture that maintains the physicochemical properties of ambient PM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%