Does the Implementation of Hardware Need Software? A Longitudinal Study on Fluoride-Removal Filter Use in Ethiopia

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the effectiveness of technology designed to provide safe and healthy water is dependent on the degree of its use. In addition to providing safe water "hardware" (i.e., new infrastructure or equipment) to populations at risk, it might be necessary to also provide suitable "software" programs (behavior change strategies) to support use. A longitudinal survey was conducted in rural Ethiopia following the distribution of fluoride-removal household filters. Three intervention groups were evaluated. Group 1 only received the hardware, i.e., the fluoride-removal filter. Groups 2 and 3 also received software in the form of two evidence-based psychological interventions: a planning and social prompts intervention and an educational workshop with pledging. Group 2 received both software interventions, and Group 3 only received the educational workshop. The effects of the hardware and software on behavior and thus filter use were analyzed along with specific psychological factors. The results showed that the provision of the hardware alone (the fluoride-removal filter) was not enough to ensure sufficient use of the equipment. The addition of a software component in the form of psychological interventions increased filter use up to 80%. An increase in filter use was measured following each intervention resulting in the health-risk being minimized. We conclude that it is necessary that the implementation of hardware of this nature is accompanied by evidence-based intervention software.

Does depression moderate handwashing in children?

“…Using a questionnaire for adults that was built on the RANAS model and has been used successfully in previous research studies in developing countries as a basis [ 15 , 19 , 20 ], we developed a quantitative questionnaire for children. Using the new questionnaire, we aimed to assess self-reported handwashing with soap at critical times and to identify the behavioral determinants that explain handwashing among primary school children.…”

Explaining low rates of sustained use of siphon water filter: evidence from follow‐up of a randomised controlled trial in Bangladesh

“…This ‘free‐trial group’ was followed for 8 months for assessment of preference and uptake of four successively provided POU water treatment technologies: three chemical disinfectants and the siphon filter (described below). Before each of the four free‐trial rounds, intervention staff explained in detail about how the local water could be contaminated with germs, and thus how it could make people sick . Details of the education and marketing interventions can be found in our previous publication .…”

Evaluation of water, sanitation and hygiene program outcomes shows knowledge-behavior gaps in Coast Province, Kenya

“…This may be due to a particular educational focus on hygiene with latrine use, but no specific indicators from this evaluation can offer a definitive explanation of this finding. The assumption that health education will result in behavior change has been a point of contention in public health since the 1980's and likewise, providing infrastructure or equipment does not ensure it will be used [ 17 , 18 ]. Though the SWASIP program did deliver hygiene education and infrastructure successfully [ 19 ], challenges with hygienic practices remain.…”