Does the legacy of state planning put pressure on ecological efficiency? Evidence from China

Abstract

Building a green and healthy economic system and achieving high‐quality economic growth have long been the development goals pursued by the Chinese government. Under the local government competition system, coordinating the relationship between economic growth and ecological sustainability is a decisive factor for China's high‐quality development. As a former state planned economy, China inherited a legacy of setting economic growth targets at various levels of government. This paper analyzes the relationship between economic growth targets and ecological efficiency by using panel data models and spatial econometric techniques. Moreover, the mediating effect model and dynamic threshold effect model are used to study their influence mechanism and the possible nonlinear relationship. The results indicate that there is an inverted U‐shaped relationship between economic growth targets and ecological efficiency. Optimizing industrial structure and R&D investment can improve regional ecological efficiency. The economic growth targets in neighboring regions have a “U”‐shaped relationship with local ecological efficiency. The mechanism test results suggest that economic growth targets affect ecological efficiency by influencing financial development, foreign direct investment, infrastructure investment, environmental regulation, and technological innovation. The impact of economic growth targets on ecological efficiency shows a significant threshold effect when economic growth targets, industrial structure, R&D levels, financial development, foreign direct investment, infrastructure investment, and environmental regulation are at different threshold values. Therefore, to promote regional healthy competition and ecological efficiency, the government should formulate scientific and reasonable economic growth goals and improve the official evaluation system.

Green Total Factor Productivity Growth: Policy-Guided or Market-Driven?

“…Based on data availability, this paper selects data from 284 prefecture-level cities in China as research objects, including 3408 samples from 2008 to 2019. The explained variable is green total factor productivity [ 47 , 48 , 49 ], and the core explanatory variables are the government’s environmental concern and the degree of marketization. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method of operational research and studying economic production boundary.…”

How does financial development environment affect regional innovation capabilities? New perspectives from digital finance and institutional quality

“…Referring to the research of Hao et al (2022) and Yang et al (2022), this paper uses Stata14.0 to calculate the Moran index of the variable to check whether there is a spatial correlation between the explained variable and the explanatory variable, and uses the geographical proximity weight matrix and the geographical distance weight matrix for comparison to reflect the robustness of the spatial correlation relationship. Table 3 presents the Moran index test results.…”

The road to green development: How can carbon emission trading pilot policy contribute to carbon peak attainment and neutrality? Evidence from China

“…An essential assumption for the DID method is that the experimental and control groups have identical trends before CETP implementation ( Hao et al, 2022 ). Specifically, this paper does not show systematic differences in the trends of carbon emissions in the sample provinces before CETP implementation, regardless of whether the CETP implementation is implemented or not.…”