Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students?

Abstract

BackgroundA learning strategy underutilized in medical education is mind mapping. Mind maps are multi-sensory tools that may help medical students organize, integrate, and retain information. Recent work suggests that using mind mapping as a note-taking strategy facilitates critical thinking. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a relationship existed between mind mapping and critical thinking, as measured by the Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT), and whether a relationship existed between mind mapping and recall of domain-based information.MethodsIn this quasi-experimental study, 131 first-year medical students were randomly assigned to a standard note-taking (SNT) group or mind map (MM) group during orientation. Subjects were given a demographic survey and pre-HSRT. They were then given an unfamiliar text passage, a pre-quiz based upon the passage, and a 30-minute break, during which time subjects in the MM group were given a presentation on mind mapping. After the break, subjects were given the same passage and wrote notes based on their group (SNT or MM) assignment. A post-quiz based upon the passage was administered, followed by a post-HSRT. Differences in mean pre- and post-quiz scores between groups were analyzed using independent samples t-tests, whereas differences in mean pre- and post-HSRT total scores and subscores between groups were analyzed using ANOVA. Mind map depth was assessed using the Mind Map Assessment Rubric (MMAR).ResultsThere were no significant differences in mean scores on both the pre- and post-quizzes between note-taking groups. And, no significant differences were found between pre- and post-HSRT mean total scores and subscores.ConclusionsAlthough mind mapping was not found to increase short-term recall of domain-based information or critical thinking compared to SNT, a brief introduction to mind mapping allowed novice MM subjects to perform similarly to SNT subjects. This demonstrates that medical students using mind maps can successfully retrieve information in the short term, and does not put them at a disadvantage compared to SNT students. Future studies should explore longitudinal effects of mind-map proficiency training on both short- and long-term information retrieval and critical thinking.

Improving Junior High Schools’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Test Three Different Models of Learning

“…(Zipp & Maher, 2013). The statement was supported by several previous research showing that mind map was proven to be effective in developing the skills in critical thinking (Eppler, 2006;D'Antoni, et al, 2010;Santiago, 2011;Pudelko, et al, 2012).…”

“…The use of mind map was intended to develop the students' critical thinking skills (Eppler, 2006;D'Antoni, et al, 2010;Pudelko, et al, 2012).…”

The longitudinal effect of concept map teaching on critical thinking of nursing students

“…During the 2-year educational program, evaluation skills demonstrated a slight increase while analytic skills significantly and sharply decreased. Contrary to the previous results, some longitudinal studies found no significant differences between CT scores in the pre and post tests (Adams et al, 1999;Daly, 2001;D'Antoni et al, 2010). The inconsistent results may be related to various definitions of CT adopted by the studies.…”

The Use of Mind Maps as an Assessment Tool in a Problem Based Learning Course

“…The use of minds maps described here is different from that described in previous studies (D'Antoni, Zipp and Olson, 2009;D'Antoni et al, 2010;Evrekli, Inel and Ali, 2010) in which the maps are drawn after students have acquired the knowledge already. In the present study mind maps are used to brain storm ideas from given clinical scenario, reactivate prior knowledge and decide what learning issues require further study.…”