2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the novel lateral trauma position cause more motion in an unstable cervical spine injury than the logroll maneuver?

Abstract: In this cadaver study, the novel lateral trauma position and the well-established log-roll maneuver resulted in comparable amounts of motion in an unstable cervical spine injury model. We suggest that the lateral trauma position may be considered for unconscious non-intubated trauma patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that lateral positioning is appropriate in certain situations. 54 Recommendation. The lift and slide transfer with trap squeeze is preferred to the log-roll when transferring patients when motion restriction is desired.…”
Section: Moving the Patient With Real Or Potential Spine Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that lateral positioning is appropriate in certain situations. 54 Recommendation. The lift and slide transfer with trap squeeze is preferred to the log-roll when transferring patients when motion restriction is desired.…”
Section: Moving the Patient With Real Or Potential Spine Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that lateral positioning is appropriate in certain situations. 59 Recommendation: We recommend the lift and slide transfer with trap squeeze to the log-roll when transferring patients if motion restriction is desired. In the case of facial fractures, an unconscious patient, or other scenarios concerning for airway compromise, the lateral position may be considered.…”
Section: Moving the Patient With Real Or Potential Spine Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%