2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the personal lift-assist device affect the local dynamic stability of the spine during lifting?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects performed 30 continuous, symmetrical, freestyle box lifts with their feet stationary (10/min) from a target on the floor to a target on a table top, which was set at 50% of their standing height. The load lifted was equivalent to 10% of each participant's maximum back strength; established previously [6][7][8]. The average load lifted was 6.93(AE0.72) kg for males, and 4.8(AE0.65) kg for females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Subjects performed 30 continuous, symmetrical, freestyle box lifts with their feet stationary (10/min) from a target on the floor to a target on a table top, which was set at 50% of their standing height. The load lifted was equivalent to 10% of each participant's maximum back strength; established previously [6][7][8]. The average load lifted was 6.93(AE0.72) kg for males, and 4.8(AE0.65) kg for females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Participants' mean age, height, and weight were 24.2(AE2.9) years, 184.9(AE7.6) cm and 85.4(AE10.7) kg for males; and 23.0(AE2.6) years, 170.1(AE6.1) cm and 66.3(AE11.7) kg for females. The lifting protocol is described elsewhere in detail [6][7][8]. Subjects performed 30 continuous, symmetrical, freestyle box lifts with their feet stationary (10/min) from a target on the floor to a target on a table top, which was set at 50% of their standing height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations