2020
DOI: 10.1177/1747954120915670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the presence of an opponent affect object projection accuracy in elite athletes? A study of the landing location of the short serve in elite badminton players

Abstract: The ability to accurately project (e.g. throw, kick, hit) an object at high speed is a uniquely human skill, and this ability has become a critical feature of many competitive sports. Nonetheless, in some sports, the target or end-point for a projected object is often not reached because an opponent intercepts or returns the object; thus, a player cannot use object landing location information to inform accuracy outcome. By comparing the landing location of serves performed without an opponent by elite badmint… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, each line value around the target reached a different value depending on the athlete accuracy doing the test. This backhand serve test is also similar to the theory [22] that short serve in badminton requires a high degree of accuracy; the shuttlecock has a downward trajectory when it crosses the top of the net and forces the opponent to hit the shuttlecock again. This theory is also in line with [23] that the short serve direction is as thin as possible with the net.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Also, each line value around the target reached a different value depending on the athlete accuracy doing the test. This backhand serve test is also similar to the theory [22] that short serve in badminton requires a high degree of accuracy; the shuttlecock has a downward trajectory when it crosses the top of the net and forces the opponent to hit the shuttlecock again. This theory is also in line with [23] that the short serve direction is as thin as possible with the net.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Short serve in badminton (most often using serve in doubles discipline) requires a high level of accuracy so that the shuttlecock has a downward trajectory when it passes over the top of the net, which forces the opponent to hit the shuttlecock back over the net at a high trajectory angle (Duncan et al, 2017;Edwards et al, 2007) [6,7] , will not land right past the service line if the shuttlecock is not returned. This makes it easier for servers to take offensive shots and score points (S. Vial et al, 2020) [18] . Judging from the data taken by the researchers, many athletes perform a half serve, making it easier for the opponent because the shuttlecock is not directional, then followed by the player's own mistakes such as going out, breaching the service (fault), and getting stuck in the net.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closer inspection of this fact led to the following conclusion: hitting from regions at the sides of the back of the pitch leads to high entropy in the majority of matches, whereas hitting from the central back positions results in a diverse distribution of spatial entropies, with a low average value. As recently identified, the presence of an opponent modifies actions and subsequent reactions [ 18 ], so the use of zones 9 and 12 may open up more space in the opponent’s court, allowing more significant variability of hitting responses. However, when the players are more affected by the presence of the opponent in central zones, the hitting response is more predictable and then has less variability (entropy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%