2003
DOI: 10.1094/phyto.2003.93.9.1111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Presence of Detached Root Border Cells of Zea mays Alter the Activity of the Pathogenic Nematode Meloidogyne incognita?

Abstract: The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita is a major pathogen of a range of important crops. Currently, control is typically achieved by the use of nematicides. However, recent work suggests that manipulating the ability of roots to slough off border cells, which then act as a decoy to the nematode, can significantly decrease damage to the roots. We investigated the attractiveness of border cells to M. incognita and the response of the nematode to border cells in close proximity. We found very limited attra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a preliminary test we determined the total phenolic content of rhizodeposition isolated from soil-grown plants using the Folin-Ciocalteu assay (Singleton and Rossi, 1965), but our results did not indicate a significant presence of phenolic compounds. Rodger et al (2003) used undiluted rhizodeposition of maize by rubbing the root tip over a medium plate. Subsequent inoculation with M. incognita juveniles did not result in attraction, as defined by the preferential alteration in direction towards rhizodeposition, but in a significant increase in nematode speed once in the immediate vicinity of border cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a preliminary test we determined the total phenolic content of rhizodeposition isolated from soil-grown plants using the Folin-Ciocalteu assay (Singleton and Rossi, 1965), but our results did not indicate a significant presence of phenolic compounds. Rodger et al (2003) used undiluted rhizodeposition of maize by rubbing the root tip over a medium plate. Subsequent inoculation with M. incognita juveniles did not result in attraction, as defined by the preferential alteration in direction towards rhizodeposition, but in a significant increase in nematode speed once in the immediate vicinity of border cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Border cells also produce signal compounds involved in the protection of meristem against pathogens and in the promotion of symbiosis (Brigham et al 1995;Hawes et al 1998). Recent work has also suggested that border cells can act as a decoy luring pathogenic nematodes and fungi away from the main root axis (Gunawardena and Hawes 2002;Rodger et al 2003). However, contradictory results have also been found highlighting the difficulties of manipulating border cell release and physiology for disease control (Wuyts et al 2006;Knox et al 2007).…”
Section: Border Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a narrow part of roots, between the tip and the root hair zone is vulnerable to nematode attack. Detached root border cells, secreted from root tips are suggested to play a significant role to misdirect plant-parasitic nematodes until the vulnerable part of the root has outgrown its attackers (Rodger et al 2003) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Root-feeding Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Migrating rootfeeding nematodes locate roots by chemical gradients of rootspecific signals (Williamson and Gleason 2003). Root border cells (RBCs) can misdirect root feeding nematodes until the vulnerable part of the root tip has outgrown its attackers (Rodger et al 2003). (2) Once targeted, root invading nematodes secrete a wide array of enzymes and signal molecules specifically targeted to downregulate host defense responses and to modify host tissues (McKenzie Bird 2004), e.g.…”
Section: Root-feeding Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%