2009
DOI: 10.1071/mu07043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the presence of grevilleas and eucalypts in urban gardens influence the distribution and foraging ecology of Noisy Miners?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More sedentary honeyeaters rely upon additional non-nectar sources of carbohydrate (e.g. lerps) during periods when localised nectar sources are not available (Ashley et al 2009). Rainbow Lorikeets (Trichoglossus haematodus) however, are highly mobile and can spend up to 94 % of their time foraging at flowers (Ashley et al 2009;Hasebe and Franklin 2004;Higgins 1999).…”
Section: Presence Of Nectarivorous Parrotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More sedentary honeyeaters rely upon additional non-nectar sources of carbohydrate (e.g. lerps) during periods when localised nectar sources are not available (Ashley et al 2009). Rainbow Lorikeets (Trichoglossus haematodus) however, are highly mobile and can spend up to 94 % of their time foraging at flowers (Ashley et al 2009;Hasebe and Franklin 2004;Higgins 1999).…”
Section: Presence Of Nectarivorous Parrotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. sideroxylon) trees that are recognised for their prolific flowering, which increases in intensity, frequency and duration as they mature (Nagendra and Gopal 2010;Smith and Lill 2008;Tzilkowski et al 1986;White et al 2005;Williams et al 2006). Elevated nectar availability from ornamental urban plantings has been anecdotally hypothesised to explain increases in nectarivore density (Anderies et al 2007;McCaffrey and Mannan 2012;McGoldrick and Mac Nally 1998) however to date, only a few studies have addressed the contribution of nectar from ornamental plantings (see Ashley et al 2009;Sewell and Catterall 1998). Additionally, it has been suggested that remnant vegetation may form an intermediate environment between the climate conditions within the urban environment and those within the non-urban environment (Carreiro and Tripler 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nectarivore abundance has previously been found to be positively associated with the amount of nectar provided by nectar-bearing plants, within both forested areas and the urban landscape (Ashley et al 2009;Collins and Newland 1986;Cotton 2007;Franklin and Noske 1999;French et al 2005;Pauw and Louw 2012;Pyke et al 1993;Ramsay 1989;Symes et al 2008). Within Australia, species of Eucalyptus and Grevillea, particularly large hybrid Grevillea spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Within Australia, species of Eucalyptus and Grevillea, particularly large hybrid Grevillea spp. that are popular in garden plantings, are recognised as important nectarproviding resources within suburban regions of cities, particularly as they produce more nectar than some non-natives (Ashley et al 2009;Catterall et al 1998;French et al 2005;Sewell and Catterall 1998). The composition and diversity of flowering vegetation within the suburban landscape has the potential to result in either a prolonged period of nectar availability or a continuous supply of nectar when nectar within non-urban habitat is scarce (Ashley et al 2009;Catterall et al 1998;French et al 2005;Sewell and Catterall 1998;Smith and Lill 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miner abundance and distribution have increased dramatically in Canberra in the last 10 years [46]. Their preferred habitat is woodland, including both trees (often eucalypts) and open areas [47][48][49].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%