2011
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.10m06784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the Presence of One Feature of Borderline Personality Disorder Have Clinical Significance?

Abstract: Low-severity levels of borderline personality disorder pathology, defined as the presence of 1 criterion, can be determined reliably and have validity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the amount of impairment associated with these different BPD criteria was not always similar. This finding suggests that, although a minimal level of BPD symptomatology is clinically significant in general (Zimmerman et al, 2012), it is important to consider what specific symptom is present. The current findings also support the idea that the validity of diagnostic systems (whether categorical or dimensional) for research and practice can be improved by weighting different features of personality disorder constructs differently based on their implications for an individual's functioning (e.g., Cooper & Balsis, 2009;Evans, Herbert, Nelson-Gray, & Gaudiano, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the amount of impairment associated with these different BPD criteria was not always similar. This finding suggests that, although a minimal level of BPD symptomatology is clinically significant in general (Zimmerman et al, 2012), it is important to consider what specific symptom is present. The current findings also support the idea that the validity of diagnostic systems (whether categorical or dimensional) for research and practice can be improved by weighting different features of personality disorder constructs differently based on their implications for an individual's functioning (e.g., Cooper & Balsis, 2009;Evans, Herbert, Nelson-Gray, & Gaudiano, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic assessment protocol for the MIDAS project has been described in detail elsewhere (e.g., Zimmerman et al, 2012). Briefly, all participants were interviewed by a trained diagnostic rater and completed the Borderline Personality Disorder section of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV; Pfohl, Blum, & Zimmerman, 1997) and a modified version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…92 An example of this appears in section 3 of the DSM-5 (conditions that require further research), 1 but at present there is no consensus among the field as to which dimensional model should be adopted. 93 Potential advantages of a dimensional approach are that (1) adolescents with BPD can be described much more in detail than previously possible, (2) subthreshold conditions can be easily identified and classified, (3) changes in BPD symptomatology over the course of illness can be more sensitively detected, and (4) therapeutic interventions could be more individually targeted.…”
Section: Dimensional Diagnostic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one criterion) are associated with substantial increases in psychosocial impairment. 19 Despite the evidence of the reliability and validity of the diagnosis, and the treatability of the condition, 20 many people with borderline personality disorder remain undiagnosed in clinical practice. This places them at risk of being given treatments that are ineffective or even harmful.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%