2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/saner.2017.7884681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the release cycle of a library project influence when it is adopted by a client project?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bavota et al [11,12] analyzed when and why developers updated inter-dependencies, and they found that a high number of bug fixes could encourage dependency updates, and API changes could discourage dependency updates. Fujibayashi et al [30] studied the relationship between library release cycle and library version updates. Kula et al [43] analyzed the practice of library updates, and found that developers rarely updated libraries.…”
Section: Update Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bavota et al [11,12] analyzed when and why developers updated inter-dependencies, and they found that a high number of bug fixes could encourage dependency updates, and API changes could discourage dependency updates. Fujibayashi et al [30] studied the relationship between library release cycle and library version updates. Kula et al [43] analyzed the practice of library updates, and found that developers rarely updated libraries.…”
Section: Update Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%