2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-016-0590-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the requirement of an engagement partner signature improve financial analysts’ information environment in the United Kingdom?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits and costs of this rule is debatable. Although three studies (Carcello and Li 2013;Liu 2017;John, Liu, and Sunder 2017) provide evidence on the benefits of a similar rule (implementation of the EP signature requirement) in the UK over a short period, there is the lack of the evidence whether the benefits of disclosing the EP's identity hold over a long-term period. This study provides first hand empirical evidence on whether and the extent to which the implementation of the EP signature requirement benefits analysts information environment over long time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The benefits and costs of this rule is debatable. Although three studies (Carcello and Li 2013;Liu 2017;John, Liu, and Sunder 2017) provide evidence on the benefits of a similar rule (implementation of the EP signature requirement) in the UK over a short period, there is the lack of the evidence whether the benefits of disclosing the EP's identity hold over a long-term period. This study provides first hand empirical evidence on whether and the extent to which the implementation of the EP signature requirement benefits analysts information environment over long time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Liu (2017) examines how the adoption of engagement partner signature requirement impacts analysts' information environment, using the UK firms as the test sample and the French, German, and Netherlandic firms as the control sample. Employing difference-in-difference analyses, Liu (2017) finds there was an increase in the analysts' following and analysts' forecast accuracy as well as a decrease in the analysts' forecast dispersion from the two-year-pre to the two-year-post-signature period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…‫جودة‬ ‫على‬ ‫ه‬ ‫وتأثير‬ ‫اجعة،‬ ‫المر‬ ‫شريك‬ ‫عن‬ ‫اإلفصاح‬ ‫لمتطلبات‬ ‫الشخصي‬ ‫الجانب‬ ‫على‬ ‫أنه‬ ‫إال‬ ‫اجعة.‬ ‫المر‬ ‫ت‬ ‫لم‬ ‫ا‬ ‫اجع‬ ‫المر‬ ‫جودة‬ ‫على‬ ‫لإلفصاح‬ ‫متسقة‬ ‫ا‬ ً ‫آثار‬ ‫حدد‬ ‫ة،‬ ‫و‬ ‫قدم‬ ‫ذلك،‬ ‫من‬ ‫العكس‬ ‫على‬ ‫ت‬ ‫البعض‬ ‫خلص‬ ‫فقد‬ ‫مختلطة،‬ ‫نتائج‬ (Carcello and Li 2013;Carcello and Santore 2015;Liu 2017;Bell 2019;Brown et al 2019;Blay et al 2019;Dao et al 2019 (Huddart and Liang 2003;2005) . .…”
unclassified