Does the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Differ from the Comprehensive System (CS) on Variables Relevant to Interpretation?

Pianowski, Giselle; Meyer, Gregory J.; Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de; Zuanazzi, Ana Carolina; Nascimento, Regina Sonia Gattas Fernandes do

doi:10.1080/00223891.2019.1677678

Cited by 15 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These protocols formed two sets of norms: 1,396 protocols to use with CS administration procedures and 640 protocols to use with R-PAS modified administration that controls for excess variability in the number of responses. Research shows that the two forms of administration lead to identical norms for all variables except for the intended targets of reducing response variability and slightly more responses overall (Hosseininasab et al, 2019;Pianowski et al, 2021). These norms are most applicable to people in the United States and other developed countries rather than to people from countries with much lower education levels (Meyer et al, 2017).…”

Section: Normative Reference Datamentioning

confidence: 97%

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) for assessing disordered thought and perception.

Meyer¹,

Mihura²

2021

Psychological Assessment of Disordered Thinking and Perception.

Self Cite

214

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Normative Reference Datamentioning

confidence: 97%

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) for assessing disordered thought and perception.

Meyer¹,

Mihura²

2021

Psychological Assessment of Disordered Thinking and Perception.

Self Cite

214

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, the most recent study (Pianowski et al, 2019) that conducted protocol-level IR analyses involved 22 adults (56% female; Age M = 29.08, SD = 12.45) from clinical and nonclinical settings. This study was completed in Brazil using four coders who had obtained certificates in coding proficiency from R-PAS.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Interrater Reliability in a Brazilian Adolescent Sample and Comparisons With Three Other Studies

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examine interrater reliability for scoring the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) in a sample of 89 adolescents ( MAge = 13.2, SD = 1.01) from Brazil using exact agreement intraclass correlations coefficient (ICCs) for the 60 protocol-level scores that are the focus of interpretation. The first author completed or reviewed all of the primary coding, and seven R-PAS proficient psychologists trained at different sites independently produced secondary coding. Overall, excellent agreement was found ( M ICC = 0.89; SD = 0.09). When averaged across this study and three other comparison studies, stronger reliability was present, in general, for commonly coded variables ( M = 0.87) as opposed to rare or infrequent variables ( M = 0.78). In addition, 78.3% of the variables showed excellent interrater reliability and an additional 20.0% had good reliability. The results also showed that the ICCs for most variables had low variability across studies, suggesting clear coding guidelines. However, variables with higher ICC variability across studies indicated domains where it would be desirable to expand guidelines with more detailed parameters. Overall, the findings indicate excellent interrater reliability for the great majority of codes and present solid grounds for future research on interrater reliability with R-PAS.

show abstract

“…Regarding the two techniques used in this study, about the Rorschach test, it is possible to verify a large number of studies, which gives the technique the accumulation of favorable evidence as well as the constant development of new interpretations, which can be verified with the recent systematization performed by Meyer, Viglione, Mihura, Erard and Erdberg (2011), proposing the Rorschach Perfomance Assessment System (R-PAS), with the objective of improving the use of some variables used as well as optimizing the application (Mihura & Meyer, 2018;Pianowski, Meyer, Villemor-Amaral, Zuanazzi, & Nascimento, 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 72%

Incremental Validity between the Wartegg and Rorschach tests (R-PAS)

Pessotto

Primi

2021

Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Incremental validity indicates how much a measure can add prevision to a criterion, more than what can be previewed by other sources of data. In other words, it means how an instrument can complement and aid on information comprehension derived from another. The objective of the study was to verify evidence of incremental validity between the Wartegg and the Rorschach tests (R-PAS). A total of 40 subjects with ages varying between 21 to 70 years participated, divided into two groups, one composed by schizophrenia diagnosis and another, by subjects with a history of psychiatric diseases. Everybody responded to the Rorschach and Wartegg tests. The results indicated predictive capacity among the instruments of 75% for the variable Formal Quality, 98% for Movement and 100% for Content. New studies are suggested about validity evidences with larger samples as well as the analysis of other variables, not explored in this study.

show abstract

Does the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Differ from the Comprehensive System (CS) on Variables Relevant to Interpretation?

Cited by 15 publications

References 46 publications

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) for assessing disordered thought and perception.

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) for assessing disordered thought and perception.

Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Interrater Reliability in a Brazilian Adolescent Sample and Comparisons With Three Other Studies

Incremental Validity between the Wartegg and Rorschach tests (R-PAS)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About