Does the structure of riparian vegetation affect the diversity of macrophytes in eastern amazonian streams?

Carmo, Rayssa Silva; Fares, Ana Luisa Biondi; Pereira, Gizelia Ferreira Matos; Michelan, Thaísa Sala

doi:10.1007/s11756-022-01181-w

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For these reasons, it is more usual to find studies that work with these groups separately. Recent studies have used the environmental variables analyzed in the US-protocol together with the diversity and distribution of aquatic macrophytes (Fares et al, 2020;Carmo et al, 2023).…”

Section: Which Components Of the Aquatic Biota Have Been Used Togethe...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the environmental quality monitoring protocol for Amazonian streams: a systematic review

Maués-Silva,

Oliveira-Junior,

Cruz

et al. 2024

Rev. ambiente água

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Amazon Rainforest is renowned for its extraordinary biodiversity and the ravages of pervasive deforestation. The removal of natural vegetation significantly affects Amazonian streams, leading to alterations in their environmental conditions. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency has devised a comprehensive protocol to monitor changes in the environmental quality of streams. Since 2011, the Sustainable Amazon Network has implemented this protocol in Amazonian streams. Our systematic review aimed to address the following questions: i) How widely has the protocol been employed in Amazonian streams?; ii) Is the utilization of this protocol well-distributed across the Amazon Basin?; iii) Which types of land use have been assessed using this protocol?; iv) Which components of the aquatic biota have been studied in conjunction with the protocol?; and, v) Which metrics of the protocol are most crucial for elucidating aquatic biota distribution? We conducted searches using the Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, identifying 34 studies that directly aligned with our objectives. It was observed that the Eastern Amazon had the highest number of streams evaluated. Additionally, aquatic insects emerged as an effective tool when utilized alongside the protocol for evaluating the impacts of changes in land use. Ultimately, the most important metrics for assessing impacts on aquatic biota were shelter availability in the channels, the preservation status of riparian forests, and water quality. We recommend developing a simplified version of this protocol to facilitate its application for research teams with limited personnel and financial resources available for fieldwork. Keywords: aquatic conservation, biomonitoring, land use change, sampling efficiency, stream ecology.

show abstract

Section: Which Components Of the Aquatic Biota Have Been Used Togethe...mentioning

confidence: 99%