2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12503-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the unconditional cash transfer program in South Africa provide support for women after child birth? Barriers to accessing the child support grant among women in informal work in Durban, South Africa

Abstract: Background The child support grant (CSG) is the largest unconditional cash transfer program in Africa and aims to alleviate poverty and improve child health and nutrition in low-income families in South Africa. Among informal working women, the CSG is an important source of income after childbirth when informal workers are unable to work, but reports suggest that women experience delays in accessing the CSG. We explore experiences and challenges of accessing the CSG among informal workers in Du… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the number of participants was small and the only purpose of the quantitative data was to provide context for the qualitative data. For example, we presented data about challenges and delays to obtaining a child support grant in the context of household food security measured at the same time points (Luthuli et al, 2022), photovoice data about child care choices combined with quantitative data about childcare used by mothers (Horwood et al, 2021), and experiences of infant feeding together with quantitative data about how planned and actual feeding practices changed at each time point (Luthuli et al, 2020). We acknowledge that the mixed methods approach for our study could have been strengthened if we had made clearer links between the qualitative and quantitative data, so that findings from the quantitative questionnaires could have guided the qualitative interviews.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the number of participants was small and the only purpose of the quantitative data was to provide context for the qualitative data. For example, we presented data about challenges and delays to obtaining a child support grant in the context of household food security measured at the same time points (Luthuli et al, 2022), photovoice data about child care choices combined with quantitative data about childcare used by mothers (Horwood et al, 2021), and experiences of infant feeding together with quantitative data about how planned and actual feeding practices changed at each time point (Luthuli et al, 2020). We acknowledge that the mixed methods approach for our study could have been strengthened if we had made clearer links between the qualitative and quantitative data, so that findings from the quantitative questionnaires could have guided the qualitative interviews.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the CSG benefit was of a magnitude smaller than that needed to cover the cost of the child’s minimum required daily energy intake. However, CSG income is predominantly used to buy food for the child and the household [ 52 ], and sometimes is the only source of income in the households [ 63 ]. Therefore, it is plausible that a difference of one year of CSG eligibility is likely too little in duration and financial amounts to have had any meaningful impacts on the cognitive function of the mothers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women who can’t access paid maternity leave or social insurance need to rely on state social assistance (the child support grant). However, this is less than minimum incomes and many women are unable to access the child support grant soon after childbirth [ 39 ] with some only accessing this support once they have returned to work after maternity leave. Most non-standard workers earn unstable and low incomes and are therefore unable to accumulate savings for their maternity leave period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%