2010
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does This Patient With Diabetes Have Large-Fiber Peripheral Neuropathy?

Abstract: Physical examination is most useful in evaluating for LFPN in patients with diabetes. Abnormal results on monofilament testing and vibratory perception (alone or in combination with the appearance of the feet, ulceration, and ankle reflexes) are the most helpful signs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The nerve conduction study is a reliable and objective diagnostic method to evaluate the diabetic polyneuropathy treatment response [26]. Although a nerve conduction study is regarded as the gold standard in clinical research, it is not useful in clinical practice because it is time-consuming, requires special devices and trained examiners, and has no general consensus regarding its criteria, even after multiple investigations [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nerve conduction study is a reliable and objective diagnostic method to evaluate the diabetic polyneuropathy treatment response [26]. Although a nerve conduction study is regarded as the gold standard in clinical research, it is not useful in clinical practice because it is time-consuming, requires special devices and trained examiners, and has no general consensus regarding its criteria, even after multiple investigations [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very reliable, because it encompasses the examination of several modalities and enables a global assessment of neuropathy inasmuch as it permits examination of both large-fiber (ankle reflexes and vibration perception) and small-fiber (pin-prick and temperature sensation) function (12). This contrasts with other diagnostic tests, such as nerve conduction study and skin biopsy, which only examine large- and small-fiber function, respectively (13,14). Of additional significance, NDS has been documented as a reliable strong predictor of the future risk for foot ulceration (1,15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…31 In the presence of thick fiber involvement, which occurs commonly in diabetic neuropathy, there is loss of plantar protective sensitivity and its early detection through the use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and the 128 Hz Tuning Fork Test allows for preventive measures that prevent progression to foot ulceration. 32 The use of Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilaments, according to several prospective studies, demonstrates that in the absence of pressure sensation with 10g monofilament, there is a high prediction for subsequent ulceration. 24 The technique recommended by the International Working Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF), adapted by the Brazilian Society of Diabetes, will be adopted, which recommends testing at 4 points instead of 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%