2015
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does This Study Make My Aorta Look Fat?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In children, an enlarging aorta can be only temporarily sealed with a stentgraft – a balloon-expandable covered stent allowing redilation to match further aortic growth. However promising it may be as a bridge operation and life-saving procedure – and a solution for those awaiting their final surgical reconstruction [ 14 , 15 ] – this modality in children helps only to delay the need for surgical repair until the patient is stable [ 9 , 16 ]. In addition, even then, it has three main disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children, an enlarging aorta can be only temporarily sealed with a stentgraft – a balloon-expandable covered stent allowing redilation to match further aortic growth. However promising it may be as a bridge operation and life-saving procedure – and a solution for those awaiting their final surgical reconstruction [ 14 , 15 ] – this modality in children helps only to delay the need for surgical repair until the patient is stable [ 9 , 16 ]. In addition, even then, it has three main disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 This is in accordance with the current European guidelines 29 on chronic dissections and American guidelines with respect to degenerative descending thoracic aortic aneurysm 30 . The newest American guidelines on chronic dissection recommend elective surgical intervention at an aortic diameter of 55 mm, and other studies discuss intervention at even smaller diameters 31,32 . If the 55 mm threshold had been applied to our study, 2 more adverse events would have been recorded, with one patient reaching the 55 mm threshold after 5.1 years and another after 8.9 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%