2024
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does time‐restricted eating add benefits to calorie restriction? A systematic review

Armin Ezzati,
Christian McLaren,
Carly Bohlman
et al.

Abstract: ObjectiveA growing body of evidence has supported the health benefits of extended daily fasting, known as time‐restricted eating (TRE); however, whether the addition of TRE enhances the known benefits of calorie restriction (CR) remains unclear.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched through April 2023. This systematic review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CR + TRE with CR alone in energy‐matched conditions of at least 8 weeks in duration that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences in secondary outcomes (WC, body fat and lean mass, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, HOMA-IR, HDL-C) were detected between TRF and CR. In contrast, improvements in blood pressure parameters and LDL-C levels were more significant in the TRF group than in the CR intervention group, in accordance with previous studies [101]. Accordingly, although no significant variations were observed in lowering body weight and improving some secondary outcomes considering the TRF dietary regimen vs. CR, further investigation of the different TRF dietary regimens could be important for establishing differences among nutritional interventions to enhance the efficacy of the TRF approach.…”
Section: A General View Of If Approachessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…No significant differences in secondary outcomes (WC, body fat and lean mass, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, HOMA-IR, HDL-C) were detected between TRF and CR. In contrast, improvements in blood pressure parameters and LDL-C levels were more significant in the TRF group than in the CR intervention group, in accordance with previous studies [101]. Accordingly, although no significant variations were observed in lowering body weight and improving some secondary outcomes considering the TRF dietary regimen vs. CR, further investigation of the different TRF dietary regimens could be important for establishing differences among nutritional interventions to enhance the efficacy of the TRF approach.…”
Section: A General View Of If Approachessupporting
confidence: 88%