2019
DOI: 10.1177/0008417419848291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does training in a top-down approach influence recorded goals and treatment plans?

Abstract: Background. Five stroke rehabilitation teams were supported in the implementation of Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) as part of a knowledge translation (KT) project called CO-OP KT. Medical record auditors noted there was occasionally a disconnect between client goals and treatment plans, revealing a need to better understand the characteristics of each and their relationship to each other. Purpose. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of goals and treatment plans in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlling for time and site variability, a nearly 9% increase was seen in acceptance for those with any CI compared to those without. Although many factors may have influenced a change in access, significant changes in knowledge, skills, and aspects of self-efficacy of healthcare providers were seen and reported following the CO-OP KT intervention [ 22 ], providing evidence that the KT intervention contributed. Below, we elaborate on the potential impact of the KT intervention on patient access and discuss these results in the context of previously reported barriers to access to rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Controlling for time and site variability, a nearly 9% increase was seen in acceptance for those with any CI compared to those without. Although many factors may have influenced a change in access, significant changes in knowledge, skills, and aspects of self-efficacy of healthcare providers were seen and reported following the CO-OP KT intervention [ 22 ], providing evidence that the KT intervention contributed. Below, we elaborate on the potential impact of the KT intervention on patient access and discuss these results in the context of previously reported barriers to access to rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling for time and site variability, a nearly 9% increase was seen in acceptance for those with any CI compared to those without. Although many factors may have influenced a change in access, significant changes in knowledge, skills, and aspects of self-efficacy of healthcare providers were seen and reported following the CO-OP KT intervention [22],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%