2009
DOI: 10.1080/13552600802673444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does treatment work with internet sex offenders? Emerging findings from the Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme (i-SOTP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding treatment, this research indicates that while the reduction and management of deviant sexual interests are likely to remain pertinent treatment targets for CEM offenders, interventions targeting broader antisocial attitudes and behaviours are less likely to be warranted. Thus, these findings provide support for previously expressed reservations about the suitability of treating CEM offenders within traditional programmes, and suggest that the needs of these offenders are likely to be better met by specialized programmes designed specifically for this group (Gillespie et al, ; Middleton, Mandeville‐Norden, & Hayes, ; Seto, ). While a small number of such treatment programmes exist internationally (Beier et al, ; Gillespie et al, ; Middleton et al, ), data pertaining to their effect on offending outcomes is limited thus far, with further evaluative research required to ensure that any treatment gains demonstrated translate to a reduction in recidivism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding treatment, this research indicates that while the reduction and management of deviant sexual interests are likely to remain pertinent treatment targets for CEM offenders, interventions targeting broader antisocial attitudes and behaviours are less likely to be warranted. Thus, these findings provide support for previously expressed reservations about the suitability of treating CEM offenders within traditional programmes, and suggest that the needs of these offenders are likely to be better met by specialized programmes designed specifically for this group (Gillespie et al, ; Middleton, Mandeville‐Norden, & Hayes, ; Seto, ). While a small number of such treatment programmes exist internationally (Beier et al, ; Gillespie et al, ; Middleton et al, ), data pertaining to their effect on offending outcomes is limited thus far, with further evaluative research required to ensure that any treatment gains demonstrated translate to a reduction in recidivism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, these findings provide support for previously expressed reservations about the suitability of treating CEM offenders within traditional programmes, and suggest that the needs of these offenders are likely to be better met by specialized programmes designed specifically for this group (Gillespie et al, ; Middleton, Mandeville‐Norden, & Hayes, ; Seto, ). While a small number of such treatment programmes exist internationally (Beier et al, ; Gillespie et al, ; Middleton et al, ), data pertaining to their effect on offending outcomes is limited thus far, with further evaluative research required to ensure that any treatment gains demonstrated translate to a reduction in recidivism. Moreover, the findings of this research suggest that although content within existing treatment programmes is likely to be relevant to dual offenders, this group may also possess additional treatment needs that are specific to the online offending process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…specific treatment programs for child sexual offenders (Lambie & Stew-anales de psicología, 2017, vol. 33, nº 3 (october) art, 2012) or Internet sex offenders (Herrero et al, 2015;Middleton, Mandeville-Norden, & Hayes, 2009)−, in order to respond to their particular therapeutical needs. Thus, additional primary research on new treatment approaches is required for future meta-analysis to identify which target groups respond best to specific techniques and which combination of treatments is most effective (Kim, Benekos & Merlo, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Child abuse images proliferated because technological advances lowered the cost of production of images, dramatically increased their availability and reduced the likelihood of those producing and possessing them being detected. By 2005, nearly one‐third of all sexual convictions in England and Wales were for internet‐related sexual offending (Middleton et al, ).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kent Internet Risk Assessment Tool, developed by Kent Police Service, measures the risk of contact offending by those who have downloaded child abuse images. The specially designed Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme was accredited for use in the community in 2006 (Middleton et al, ). Relatively little research has been undertaken about how technology can be used to manage internet child sex offenders.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%