2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02848.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does ultrasound training boost Year 1 medical student competence and confidence when learning abdominal examination?

Abstract: Ultrasound training as an adjunct to traditional means of teaching abdominal examination improves students' physical examination technique after students have acquired skills with basic examination manoeuvres.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
136
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
136
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10] Two medical schools that taught ultrasound early in the medical school curriculum restricted it to anatomy courses without bedside clinical applications. 9,11 However, this study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of ultrasound use among second year students in an integrated physical diagnosis course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9][10] Two medical schools that taught ultrasound early in the medical school curriculum restricted it to anatomy courses without bedside clinical applications. 9,11 However, this study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of ultrasound use among second year students in an integrated physical diagnosis course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few medical schools have performed pilot projects teaching ultrasound to smaller groups of students with class sizes ranging from 5-176 students. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Unlike our project, most of these schools limited ultrasound teaching to senior medical students. [7][8][9][10] Two medical schools that taught ultrasound early in the medical school curriculum restricted it to anatomy courses without bedside clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As others have reported, 2,5,9,12,16 students welcomed the introduction of PU into anatomy teaching, valued opportunities to see and/or use an imaging modality which they anticipated using in the future 6,10,17,18 and (indicative of their enjoyment and perceived value of the sessions) they wanted more frequent and longer US sessions. 2,[9][10][11][12]19 Overall, MS-A students responded more positively than MS-B students.…”
Section: Introduction To Pu As An Imaging Technology and A Teaching Toolmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was reaffirmed in focus groups where students commented that the haptic experience of scanning their peers aided image orientation and interpretation. Several pilot studies 19,[22][23][24][25] and studies with student cohorts 5,7,18,26 show that, with focussed training, students can gain sufficient scanning proficiency for clinical examination. However, Sweetman et al 12 caution that infrequent scanning opportunities encourage confidence without skill development, since ultrasound scanning did not improve students' performance in clinical examinations.…”
Section: Introduction To Pu As An Imaging Technology and A Teaching Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crossover design mitigates the potential bias of a small sample size and can ensure equal educational opportunities by making each subject his or her own case and control. 16,17 Another ethical challenge in EM education research is the potential conflict of interest for the faculty member in the dual role of educator and researcher. For these individuals, there exists a tension, and potential conflict of interest, between meeting the challenges of answering a research question and fulfilling the responsibilities of serving as a teacher and mentor.…”
Section: Ethical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%