Does (un)-related variety promote regional innovation in China? Industry versus services sector

Abstract

Purpose Although recent studies have increased attention on the effects of related and unrelated variety on innovation, a Chinese test has until now been missing from the literature. This paper aims to investigate how related and unrelated variety affect regional innovation in Chinese provinces. In particular, emphasis was placed on differentiating the analysis for the industry and services sectors at a detailed sectoral level. Design/methodology/approach This paper’s sample is composed of 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2016. Feasible generalized least squares was used to estimate the effects of related and unrelated variety on regional innovation. Findings The results show that related variety in all sectors promotes regional innovation, whereas unrelated variety in all sectors does not play a role. In-depth analyses were performed by comparing the industry and services sectors. Only related variety in the industry sector and unrelated variety in the services sector promote regional innovation, whereas unrelated variety in the industry sector exerts a negative effect. After dividing the country into eastern, central and western regions, different findings appear in the sub-samples. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature on evolutionary economic geography and innovation by exploring how related and unrelated variety promote regional innovation in a developing country context (China). It also sheds light on the sectoral and regional differences in the influence of related and unrelated variety on regional innovation.

Does Environmental Decentralization Improve Regional Green Innovation? Evidence from China

“…The development level of Chinese economy is unequal in different regions (Pan, X.F. 287 et al, 2020;Yang, N.N. et al, 2020).…”

Does global value chain position affect innovation performance of China’s high-tech industries?

“…Moreover, patent applications can effectively reflect the effect of knowledge spillovers, while patent grants may take several years before they are formally granted (Ning et al , 2016). Thus, patent applications as a quantified indicator of innovation performance have been widely used in the innovation literature (Xin et al , 2019; Yang et al , 2020b). Second, the number of total patents is composed of the number of applied patents for invention, utility model and appearance design, which is relatively representative, systematic and accessible (Lao et al , 2021).…”

How does industrial agglomeration affect regional innovation? A spatial econometric analysis

“…Recent studies have examined the impacts of industrial (un)‐related variety on regional innovation. However, they have generated mixed results (Miguelez & Moreno, 2017; Tavassoli & Carbonara, 2014; Yang, Liu, & Qi, 2020). These inconclusive and mixed results may be due to ignoring the sectoral aggregations used to measure industrial (un)related variety at the city level and the interregional externalities of industrial (un)related variety from a spatial perspective (Tang et al., 2019).…”

“…Therefore, certain evolutionary economic geographers have disentangled industrial variety into industrial related and unrelated variety to clarify the mechanism of Jacobs' spillover (Boschma & Iammarino, 2009; Frenken et al., 2007). Specific studies have investigated the effect of industrial variety on innovation along with the types of related and unrelated variety in Europe (Miguelez & Moreno, 2017); in developed countries, including Sweden (Ejdemo & Ortqvist, 2020; Tavassoli & Carbonara, 2014), the US (Castaldi et al., 2015), Norway (Aarstad et al., 2016), and Germany (Hesse & Fornahl, 2020); and in developing countries, such as Turkey (Erkus‐Ozturk, 2018) and China (Huang et al., 2021; Yang, Liu, & Qi, 2020). However, these studies have ignored the impact of industrial specialization.…”