2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does urea modify microheterogeneous nature of ionic amide deep eutectics? Clues from non-reactive and reactive solute-centered dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, dynamic heterogeneity has been previously reported as an important characteristic of DESs, resulting in the fractional dependence of the solute reorientation time scale on viscosity. 23 A previous report on a nonionic DES predicts that depending on the structure and the intermolecular interactions of the probe, it would selectively reside in a specific nanodomain of the heterogeneous DES. 31 As ethaline DES is also heterogeneous, 48,49 there could indeed be a scenario where a solute would be located in a different domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, dynamic heterogeneity has been previously reported as an important characteristic of DESs, resulting in the fractional dependence of the solute reorientation time scale on viscosity. 23 A previous report on a nonionic DES predicts that depending on the structure and the intermolecular interactions of the probe, it would selectively reside in a specific nanodomain of the heterogeneous DES. 31 As ethaline DES is also heterogeneous, 48,49 there could indeed be a scenario where a solute would be located in a different domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20−22 Due to the diverse intermolecular interactions within DES components, the formation of heterogeneous nanostructures in a DES has been reported. 23,24 Although bulk viscosity has been measured for different deep eutectic systems, it is highly unlikely that uniform viscosity is maintained across the heterogeneous nanostructures. It is still unknown if a solute dissolved in a DES nanodomain would sense the bulk DES viscosity or domain-specific effective viscosity.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 An important characteristic of DESs�"dynamic heterogeneity"� is suggested by the fractional dependence of a solute's solvation ⟨τ s ⟩ or rotation ⟨τ r ⟩ time on viscosity η and temperature T, which scales as ⟨τ s/r ⟩ ∝(η/T) p with an exponent 0.4 < p < 0.7. 31 In contrast, conventional Stokes− Einstein and Stokes−Einstein−Debye would predict p = 1. Multi-or stretched-exponential relaxation of dynamic structure factors observed in MD simulations explain this viscosity dependence through the existence of spatially varying relaxation rates, reinforcing the idea of a high degree of solution heterogeneity and the formation of domains.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DESs have been studied with a range of approaches, including dielectric, viscoelastic, , nuclear magnetic , and ultrasonic relaxation, , optical Kerr effect spectroscopy, fluorescence measurements, wide-angle and quasi-elastic neutron scattering, simulated X-ray scattering structure function calculations, empirical potential structure refinement (EPSR), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. ,, For instance, femtosecond Raman-induced Kerr-effect spectroscopy measurements allowed, in some cases, direct observation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding . An important characteristic of DESs“dynamic heterogeneity”is suggested by the fractional dependence of a solute’s solvation ⟨τ s ⟩ or rotation ⟨τ r ⟩ time on viscosity η and temperature T , which scales as ⟨τ s/r ⟩ ∝(η/ T ) p with an exponent 0.4 < p < 0.7 . In contrast, conventional Stokes–Einstein and Stokes–Einstein–Debye would predict p = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 An important characteristic of DESs -"dynamic heterogeneity" -is suggested by the fractional dependence of a solutes solvation τ s or rotation τ r time on viscosity η and temperature T , which scales as τ s/r ∝ (η/T ) p with an exponent 0.4 < p < 0.7. 31 In contrast, conventional Stokes-Einstein and Stokes-Einstein-Debye would predict p = 1. Multior stretched-exponential relaxation of dynamic structure factors observed in MD simulations explain this viscosity dependence through the existence of spatially varying relaxation rates, reinforcing the idea of a high degree of solution heterogeneity and the formation of domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%