Does User Fee Removal Policy Provide Financial Protection from Catastrophic Health Care Payments? Evidence from Zambia

Abstract

BackgroundOut-of-pocket payments in health care have been shown to impose significant burden on households in Sub-Saharan Africa, leading to constrained access to health care and impoverishment. In an effort to reduce the financial burden imposed on households by user fees, some countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have abolished user fees in the health sector. Zambia is one of few countries in Sub-Saharan Africa to abolish user fees in primary health care facilities with a view to alleviating financial burden of out-of-pocket payments among the poor. The main aim of this paper was to examine the extent and patterns of financial protection from fees following the decision to abolish user fees in public primary health facilities.MethodsOur analysis is based on a nationally representative health expenditure and utilization survey conducted in 2014. We calculated the incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure based on households’ out-of-pocket payments during a visit as a percentage of total household consumption expenditure. We further show the intensity of the problem of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) experienced by households.ResultsOur analysis show that following the removal of user fees, a majority of patients who visited public health facilities benefitted from free care at the point of use. Further, seeking care at public primary health facilities is associated with a reduced likelihood of incurring CHE after controlling for economic wellbeing and other covariates. However, 10% of households are shown to suffer financial catastrophe as a result of out-of-pocket payments. Further, there is considerable inequality in the incidence of CHE whereby the poorest expenditure quintile experienced a much higher incidence.ConclusionDespite the removal of user fees at primary health care level, CHE is high among the poorest sections of the population. This study also shows that cost of transportation is mainly responsible for limiting the protective effectiveness of user fee removal on CHE among particularly poorest households.

Patient costs of diabetes mellitus care in public health care facilities in Kenya

“…For instance, 48.9% of the patients reported lack of medicines and diagnostic facilities as a reason for not visiting nearest facilities. This phenomenon has been observed from studies in Uganda and Zambia . Prior studies conducted in Kenya highlight that transport costs are a key access barrier especially to poor patients .…”

The path to longer and healthier lives for all Africans by 2030: the Lancet Commission on the future of health in sub-Saharan Africa

“…154 The risk of catastrophic health payments remains concentrated among the poorest of the poor, and transport cost is the main determinant of limited protective effect. 155 It is important to acknowledge that financial barriers are only one of many considerations for inadequate access to care; others include different price elasticities across health services, the opportunity cost of time for the poor, high non-medical direct costs (e.g. transport) or medical costs borne outside facilities (e.g.…”

Equity in Financing and Distribution of Health Benefits in Zambia

“…Some of the key health financing reforms which have been implemented over the years include the abolition of user fees in rural areas, peri-urban areas, and all primary health care facilities in 2006, 2007, and 2012, respectively (Carasso et al 2012Masiye, Kaonga, and Kirigia 2016).…”