Does welfare drive international migration? – a European experience

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of empirical research on welfare magnetism and to assess the size and scope of the welfare magnet effect on the non-EU migrants in selected immigration countries of the European Union. Design/methodology/approach A conditional logistic regression model with interactions is used to estimate the strength of the welfare magnet effect, while controlling for demographic characteristics of the migrants and country-specific economic indicators. Data, used for estimation, comes from the Immigrant Citizen Survey, which provides a large, representative sample of first-generation (i.e. non-EU born) migrants. Various measures of welfare generosity are tested to assure the robustness of the results. Findings The coefficients suggest that the welfare magnet effect is present and significant in some immigrant groups, although it can have a negative impact on location decisions in other cases. Similar results are obtained for wage and unemployment indicators. Research limitations/implications Results corroborate the welfare magnet hypothesis, which states that more generous welfare states should expect greater clustering of negatively-selected (i.e. lower educated) migrants. One potential limitation comes from the sample size, which does not allow for more general conclusions. Practical implications Heterogeneous effects of basic economic indicators in different demographic groups show that aggregate immigrant flows, used widely in the literature, can provide biased estimates of welfare magnet effect. Originality/value This paper adds to the available literature by using representative, recently collected data and employing a more complete list of controls in a quantitative analysis of migration decisions.

Questioning the feasibility and justice of basic income accounting for migration

“…If basic income is interpreted as an increase in welfare benefits, it hence encourages immigration of net beneficiaries and emigration of net contributors. Empirical evidence from Europe strengthens this so-called welfare-magnet hypothesis in regard to lowskilled immigrants (De Jong et al, 2020;Jakubiak, 2019;Razin and Wahba, 2015). Moreover, Cebolla-Boado and Miyar-Busto (2020: 186-189) find that while highskilled individuals are attracted by high wages, they are deterred by social expenditure, albeit only in the short-term.…”

Rethinking exclusionary policies: the case of irregular migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe

“…Indeed, national governments have sought to curb irregular migration by reducing the number and scope of entitlements that irregular migrants may receive. Concerned about what has been coined 'welfare magnet' (Jakubiak, 2019), they have been implementing increasingly restrictive policies in order to act as a deterrent for migrants, particularly irregular ones. However, at the local level, municipalities are required to provide some services to people regardless of status as a matter of law.…”

Refugee Migration and the Labor Market: Lessons from 40 Years of Post-Arrival Policies in Denmark

“…By synthesizing extensive evidence from 40 years of policy experiences and reforms targeting refugees in Denmark, we supplement existing reviews of the literature (see e.g. Brell et al 2020;Jakubiak 2019;Eggebø and Brekke 2018;Verme and Schuettler 2021). In doing so, we also add to the large literature on immigrant assimilation and refugee integration (see e.g.…”