2020
DOI: 10.5642/jhummath.202002.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Your Course Effectively Promote Creativity? Introducing the Mathematical Problem Solving Creativity Rubric

Abstract: As believers in the power of blending the creative with the quantitative, we design our courses with an eye towards developing creative problem solvers. However, when it comes time to evaluate our course's success in developing creative problem solvers we come away with a plethora of qualitative evidence and yet we are left hungry for the quantitative evidence we desire as mathematicians. In this article we describe the development of the Mathematical Problem Solving Creativity Rubric and its pilot use in a fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies found that rubric is effective in assessing students' higher-order thinking skills, e.g., Marzano Rubric (Marzano & Kendall, 2007), Simulation Thinking Rubric (Doolen, 2015), and Assessment Evaluation Rubric (Tractenberg, 2020). However, the study of the effectiveness of rubric in measuring students higher-order thinking comprehensively in mathematics learning is limited, although there are problem-solving rubrics (Blyman et al, 2020;Di Leo et al, 2019;Gallagher et al, 2000), critical thinking rubric (Saxton et al, 2012), and performance assessment rubric (Borko et al, 1997;Lane et al, 1994) used. Therefore, to measure students' HOTs in mathematics learning, the teacher needs to develop an appropriate rubric.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found that rubric is effective in assessing students' higher-order thinking skills, e.g., Marzano Rubric (Marzano & Kendall, 2007), Simulation Thinking Rubric (Doolen, 2015), and Assessment Evaluation Rubric (Tractenberg, 2020). However, the study of the effectiveness of rubric in measuring students higher-order thinking comprehensively in mathematics learning is limited, although there are problem-solving rubrics (Blyman et al, 2020;Di Leo et al, 2019;Gallagher et al, 2000), critical thinking rubric (Saxton et al, 2012), and performance assessment rubric (Borko et al, 1997;Lane et al, 1994) used. Therefore, to measure students' HOTs in mathematics learning, the teacher needs to develop an appropriate rubric.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%